Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Positivity sets should be just datasets without experimental data #759

Closed
Zaharid opened this issue May 4, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed
Assignees

Comments

@Zaharid
Copy link
Contributor

Zaharid commented May 4, 2020

There is no in principle reason why we shouldn't have cuts and compound opertators in the positivity specs. We already found it convenient to extend them in the past, e.g. by adding plotting files for them.

On the contrary maintaining a separate structure leads to some code duplication (see e.g. #757), which is not that bad in itself, but still it is one more needless special case to consider.

As far as I can tell, this would be a fairly minor code change in vp once we get rid of libnnpdf and would not require modifying any new files.

cc @enocera @wilsonmr

@scarlehoff
Copy link
Member

Closed with #1678

@scarlehoff scarlehoff unpinned this issue Mar 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants