Update Project.toml

[jd-lara]

No description provided.

[GabrielKS]

Looks like this should have been caught quite a while ago, but PowerGraphics uses the old PowerSimulations BookKeeping struct in testing, so the tests are not compatible with the version of PowerSimulations that PowerAnalytics = "^0.6" requires. PowerGraphics also calls PowerSimulations outside of testing, though minimally.

[jd-lara]

@GabrielKS yeah, the interaction between PG and PSI is kinda broken right now. I'll try to fix it if I have time.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (2b0a625) 5.60% compared to head (1dfae8a) 88.49%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            main     #112       +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   5.60%   88.49%   +82.89%     
==========================================
  Files          6        6               
  Lines        339      339               
==========================================
+ Hits          19      300      +281     
+ Misses       320       39      -281     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	88.49% <100.00%> (+82.89%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files	Coverage Δ
src/call_plots.jl	76.66% <ø> (+76.66%)	⬆️
src/definitions.jl	88.88% <100.00%> (+63.49%)	⬆️
src/make_report.jl	100.00% <ø> (+100.00%)	⬆️
src/plot_recipes.jl	97.18% <100.00%> (+97.18%)	⬆️
src/plotly_recipes.jl	97.29% <100.00%> (+97.29%)	⬆️

[GabrielKS]

Tests pass for me, approving without too strict a review since the initial scope was so small. Noting that I had to delete my old test_results directory and make it regenerate before the tests worked, but now that I have a new test_results directory I don't have to delete it between tests.