You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think we discussed such an encoding that was in use in BioInterchange. As far as I remember, the consensus was that it would be better to just use a "Position" (i.e., not expressing strandedness at all), because that information could be added later.
If the sequence is inherently unstranded, then I think that "Position" would be sufficient for the encoding too. Otherwise, users might opt to use "UnstrandedPosition" when they do not know the strand, and then later, this would create a contradiction when strand information is added for the position.
I remember, the discussion came up when talking about restrictions. We have Stranded for UnknownStrandedness
but we don't have a concept of can not be stranded at all. NeverStranded or ImpossibleToBeStranded could be options.
As FALDO does not describe the concepts of sequences its hard to infer or detect
that a sequence can not be stranded.
We could add a UnstrandedPosition which is disjoint with a StrandedPosition
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: