Skip to content

rdf and ttl vs .owl and RDF/XML format #256

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
mkeet opened this issue Mar 31, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

rdf and ttl vs .owl and RDF/XML format #256

mkeet opened this issue Mar 31, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@mkeet
Copy link

mkeet commented Mar 31, 2025

Since the tool is "model2owl", one expects a file with a .owl file extension among the files generated and that that file uses the official exchange syntax, i.e., RDF/XML, but currently it does neither.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@mkeet