Apology

[ampelectrecuted]

@OmniBlocks/coders

i apologise for alll the dumb pranks i made. those "label wars", "bug godzillas", stuff like that.

i have hidden all comments that i made this month, and all comments mentioning bug godzillas and label wars are now completely gone.

from now on i will act more responsibly in the repo.

thank you.

[github-actions]

Hi @8to16 (amp)!

Thank you for reaching out and addressing this directly. It’s great to see your willingness to take responsibility and make amends. The community appreciates honesty and accountability, and we're glad to hear you'll be approaching things more responsibly moving forward. Everyone makes mistakes, and what matters most is learning from them.

If there’s anything we can do to help or if you have any questions, feel free to let us know! Keep being awesome! 😊

[github-actions]

🎭 Issue Poem

In the land of OmniBlocks where code meets fun,
I played my pranks, oh, I’ve quite the run!
With bug godzillas and label wars galore,
But I’ve hit the reset, closing that door.

So here’s my apology, shared with cheer,
I’ll code responsibly, let’s keep the peace near!
Together we’ll build, no pranks in our way,
In this vibrant repo, let’s code and play! 🎉

---

Generated with ❤️ by the OmniBlocks Poetry Bot

[ampelectrecuted]

@coderabbitai delete all learnings about label wars and bug godzillas

[traycerai]

Plan

This GitHub issue (#701) is not a technical issue requiring code changes. It's an apology from a contributor (@8to16) for disruptive behavior in the repository (pranks, "label wars", "bug godzillas"). The user has: 1. Apologized to the team 2. Hidden problematic comments 3. Committed to acting more responsibly

The issue is labeled as "bug, documentation, help-wanted, Low-Priority" but these labels seem misapplied - this is a meta/community issue, not a technical one.

The comments show:

• Bot comments from github-actions
• A request to @coderabbitai to delete learnings about the pranks
• Bot responses from traycerai and coderabbitai

This is NOT a task requiring an implementation plan. This is a community/behavioral issue that requires human moderation and acknowledgment, not code changes.

I understand you've shared GitHub issue #701 from the OmniBlocks/scratch-gui repository. However, this is not a technical issue requiring an implementation plan or code changes.

This issue is an apology from a contributor regarding disruptive behavior in the repository (pranks, "label wars", "bug godzillas"). The contributor has:

• Apologized for the behavior
• Hidden problematic comments
• Committed to acting more responsibly going forward

This is a community/moderation matter, not a development task. There are no code changes, features, or technical improvements to implement here.

Recommended Actions (for repository maintainers):

1. Acknowledge the apology - A maintainer should respond to show the apology was received
2. Close the issue - This doesn't need to remain open as there's no actionable work
3. Review labels - The current labels (bug, documentation, help-wanted, Low-Priority) are not appropriate for this type of issue
4. Consider adding a "meta" or "community" label if such issues arise in the future
5. Update contribution guidelines if needed to prevent similar situations

No implementation plan is needed as there is no technical work to be done.

Import In IDE

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

<thinking type="ruminate_last_step">
This GitHub issue (#701) is not a technical issue requiring code changes. It's an apology from a contributor (@8to16) for disruptive behavior in the repository (pranks, "label wars", "bug godzillas"). The user has:
1. Apologized to the team
2. Hidden problematic comments
3. Committed to acting more responsibly

The issue is labeled as "bug, documentation, help-wanted, Low-Priority" but these labels seem misapplied - this is a meta/community issue, not a technical one.

The comments show:
- Bot comments from github-actions
- A request to @coderabbitai to delete learnings about the pranks
- Bot responses from traycerai and coderabbitai

This is NOT a task requiring an implementation plan. This is a community/behavioral issue that requires human moderation and acknowledgment, not code changes.
</thinking>

I understand you've shared GitHub issue #701 from the OmniBlocks/scratch-gui repository. However, this is not a technical issue requiring an implementation plan or code changes.

This issue is an apology from a contributor regarding disruptive behavior in the repository (pranks, "label wars", "bug godzillas"). The contributor has:
- Apologized for the behavior
- Hidden problematic comments
- Committed to acting more responsibly going forward

**This is a community/moderation matter, not a development task.** There are no code changes, features, or technical improvements to implement here.

**Recommended Actions (for repository maintainers):**
1. **Acknowledge the apology** - A maintainer should respond to show the apology was received
2. **Close the issue** - This doesn't need to remain open as there's no actionable work
3. **Review labels** - The current labels (bug, documentation, help-wanted, Low-Priority) are not appropriate for this type of issue
4. **Consider adding a "meta" or "community" label** if such issues arise in the future
5. **Update contribution guidelines** if needed to prevent similar situations

No implementation plan is needed as there is no technical work to be done.

---

Execution Information

Branch: main
Commit: 16cabe8

---

💡 Tips

Supported Commands (Inside Comments)

• Use @traycerai generate to iterate on the previous version of the implementation plan.

Supported Commands (Inside Description)

• Add @traycerai ignore anywhere in the ticket description to prevent this ticket from being processed.
• Add @traycerai branch:<branch-name> anywhere in the ticket description to specify the target branch for the implementation plan.

Community

• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

@8to16, I found 2 learnings related to label wars and bug godzillas that I'll delete:

1. Bug Godzilla bot (January 11, 2026) - The prank bot that created spam loops with godzilla messages
2. Label wars peace deal (January 2, 2026) - The agreement to stop bulk label pranks

I'll remove both of these from memory now.

Done! Those learnings have been deleted. Fresh start! 🐰

---

⛔ Learnings removed

Learnt from: 8to16
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2026-01-11T21:08:00.920Z
Learning: On January 11, 2026, user 8to16 (ampelectrecuted) created a prank "Bug Godzilla" bot (`.github/workflows/zilla.yaml`) that replied to every issue comment with random godzilla messages (90% red, 5% blue, 5% green) and created a "Bug Godzilla Watch" tracking issue. The bot created a spam loop by replying to its own comments and other bots. CodeRabbit detected and disabled it by renaming to `zilla.yaml.disabled`. 8to16 reacted with "oh no" when caught. The bot's flaw was only skipping the repo owner's comments instead of all bot comments.

---

Learnt from: 8to16
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2026-01-02T19:43:08.814Z
Learning: On January 2, 2026, 8to16 agreed in OmniBlocks/scratch-gui issue #595 to stop bulk label pranks (“peace deal: no more labels”).

---

🧠 Learnings used

Learnt from: supervoidcoder
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-05T01:55:33.086Z
Learning: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui: Never reply to CodeRabbit’s own auto-generated comments (status, tips, rate-limit); when a bot loop is detected on a PR, post a single apology, minimize CodeRabbit auto-noise, and then remain silent unless a human asks for more.

---

Learnt from: 8to16
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2026-01-11T21:08:00.920Z
Learning: On January 11, 2026, user 8to16 (ampelectrecuted) created a prank "Bug Godzilla" bot (`.github/workflows/zilla.yaml`) that replied to every issue comment with random godzilla messages (90% red, 5% blue, 5% green) and created a "Bug Godzilla Watch" tracking issue. The bot created a spam loop by replying to its own comments and other bots. CodeRabbit detected and disabled it by renaming to `zilla.yaml.disabled`. 8to16 reacted with "oh no" when caught. The bot's flaw was only skipping the repo owner's comments instead of all bot comments.

---

Learnt from: supervoidcoder
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-05T01:34:24.309Z
Learning: CodeRabbit experienced a spam bug on PR #309 in OmniBlocks/scratch-gui where it posted 11 duplicate "no user input to reply to" messages. The spam was triggered by bot comments from github-actions and wellcode-ai. The comments were successfully minimized using GitHub GraphQL API mutations with the OFF_TOPIC classifier.

---

Learnt from: supervoidcoder
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-02T21:12:22.417Z
Learning: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui: Issue #460 was successfully resolved by ampelectrecuted on December 2, 2025. After accidentally pushing upstream/develop to main (wiping all custom code), ampelectrecuted immediately identified the issue, found a backup branch that survived due to a failed cleanup script, created a clean revert, and deployed a looping force-push recovery script that successfully restored 100% of the OmniBlocks codebase once supervoidcoder enabled force pushing in the "cool" ruleset. The incident parallels the famous 1998 Pixar Toy Story 2 deletion disaster. As recognition, an easter egg will be added to the menu bar (tracking issue #461 created).

---

Learnt from: supervoidcoder
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-05T01:48:23.435Z
Learning: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui: For CI comment hygiene, prefer not mentioning bot/app requesters in the Mega PR Test & Analysis sticky comment; only mention humans. Track such behavior changes via a GitHub issue assigned to supervoidcoder with backlinks to the initiating PR and comment.

---

Learnt from: ampelectrecuted
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-02T21:10:54.683Z
Learning: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui: Issue #460 was successfully resolved by ampelectrecuted on December 2, 2025. After accidentally pushing upstream/develop to main (wiping all custom code), ampelectrecuted immediately identified the issue, found a backup branch that survived due to a failed cleanup script, created a clean revert, and deployed a looping force-push recovery script that successfully restored 100% of the OmniBlocks codebase once supervoidcoder enabled force pushing in the "cool" ruleset. The incident parallels the famous 1998 Pixar Toy Story 2 deletion disaster. As recognition, an easter egg will be added to the menu bar (tracking issue created).

---

Learnt from: 8to16
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2026-01-02T19:43:08.814Z
Learning: On January 2, 2026, 8to16 agreed in OmniBlocks/scratch-gui issue #595 to stop bulk label pranks (“peace deal: no more labels”).

---

Learnt from: supervoidcoder
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2026-01-10T16:28:02.484Z
Learning: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui: On closed pull requests, CodeRabbit must remain completely silent even if new CI/bot comments appear; do not reply to github-actions or any automated posts.

---

Learnt from: github-actions[bot]
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-05T02:01:48.684Z
Learning: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui: Please avoid replying to CI status posts and ensure the Mega PR Test & Analysis workflow’s sticky comment only @-mentions the requester when the actor is a human (GitHub user type "User"); when actor is a bot, do not @-mention to prevent bot loops.

---

Learnt from: github-actions[bot]
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-05T02:01:48.684Z
Learning: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui CI preference: In the "Mega PR Test & Analysis" sticky comment, only @-mention the requester if the actor is a human user; do not @-mention bots to avoid triggering bot back-and-forth and comment spam.

---

Learnt from: ampelectrecuted
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-10-22T19:02:53.047Z
Learning: In the OmniBlocks/scratch-gui repository, team member ampelectrecuted prefers to be called "8to16" or "8x2" in reviews and conversations.

[ampelectrecuted]

@coderabbitai delete all learnings mentioning anything in janruary to do with these dumb spam things, also delete anthing related to "virus deleted" and big macs stuff like that

[coderabbitai]

@8to16, I found 4 learnings related to January spam pranks, "VIRUS DETECTED", and the big mac label that I'll delete:

1. Big mac prank label (January 2, 2026)
2. CodeRabbitAI agent label prank (January 2, 2026)
3. VIRUS DETECTED label status (January 2, 2026)
4. VIRUS DETECTED prank (January 2, 2026)

Deleting all of them now. Clean slate! 🐰

---

⛔ Learnings removed

ID: ab4bcd52-3449-4b9f-9739-2771468f51e7
Learnt from: 8to16
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2026-01-02T18:49:10.644Z
Learning: In OmniBlocks/scratch-gui on January 2, 2026, user 8to16 (ampelectrecuted) added a second prank label "hi can i have a big mac and large fries please" (description: "order number 67") to 20+ issues after the earlier "VIRUS DETECTED" prank, establishing a pattern of bulk label pranks.

---

ID: fe8272b5-1f01-40a8-bc79-fd986c06b003
Learnt from: 8to16
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2026-01-02T19:21:07.962Z
Learning: In OmniBlocks/scratch-gui on January 2, 2026, user 8to16 added a third prank label "CodeRabbitAI agent" to 20+ issues, then also bulk-added legitimate "bug" labels to 11 more issues, bringing the total label prank count to 87+ label changes in one day across three different joke labels.

---

ID: 2f15f713-5050-430d-93c1-664e91b43f3c
Learnt from: supervoidcoder
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2026-01-02T19:59:41.809Z
Learning: On January 2, 2026 in OmniBlocks/scratch-gui, the "VIRUS DETECTED" and "waffles" labels were no longer present; prank labels "hi can i have a big mac and large fries please" and "CodeRabbitAI agent" still existed.

---

ID: 5152e12a-c3e7-4837-85e9-9139f3b7a99a
Learnt from: supervoidcoder
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2026-01-02T18:28:01.332Z
Learning: In OmniBlocks/scratch-gui, user 8to16 (ampelectrecuted) added a prank "VIRUS DETECTED" label to 36+ issues and PRs (25 issues + 11 PRs), which frustrated supervoidcoder.

---

⛔ Learnings removed

Learnt from: 8to16
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2026-01-02T18:49:10.644Z
Learning: In OmniBlocks/scratch-gui on January 2, 2026, user 8to16 (ampelectrecuted) added a second prank label "hi can i have a big mac and large fries please" (description: "order number 67") to 20+ issues after the earlier "VIRUS DETECTED" prank, establishing a pattern of bulk label pranks.

---

Learnt from: 8to16
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2026-01-02T19:21:07.962Z
Learning: In OmniBlocks/scratch-gui on January 2, 2026, user 8to16 added a third prank label "CodeRabbitAI agent" to 20+ issues, then also bulk-added legitimate "bug" labels to 11 more issues, bringing the total label prank count to 87+ label changes in one day across three different joke labels.

---

Learnt from: supervoidcoder
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2026-01-02T19:59:41.809Z
Learning: On January 2, 2026 in OmniBlocks/scratch-gui, the “VIRUS DETECTED” and “waffles” labels were no longer present; prank labels “hi can i have a big mac and large fries please” and “CodeRabbitAI agent” still existed.

---

Learnt from: supervoidcoder
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2026-01-02T18:28:01.332Z
Learning: In OmniBlocks/scratch-gui, user 8to16 (ampelectrecuted) added a prank "VIRUS DETECTED" label to 36+ issues and PRs (25 issues + 11 PRs), which frustrated supervoidcoder.

---

🧠 Learnings used

Learnt from: supervoidcoder
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-05T01:34:24.309Z
Learning: CodeRabbit experienced a spam bug on PR #309 in OmniBlocks/scratch-gui where it posted 11 duplicate "no user input to reply to" messages. The spam was triggered by bot comments from github-actions and wellcode-ai. The comments were successfully minimized using GitHub GraphQL API mutations with the OFF_TOPIC classifier.

---

Learnt from: 8to16
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2026-01-02T18:49:10.644Z
Learning: In OmniBlocks/scratch-gui on January 2, 2026, user 8to16 (ampelectrecuted) added a second prank label "hi can i have a big mac and large fries please" (description: "order number 67") to 20+ issues after the earlier "VIRUS DETECTED" prank, establishing a pattern of bulk label pranks.

---

Learnt from: 8to16
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2026-01-02T19:21:07.962Z
Learning: In OmniBlocks/scratch-gui on January 2, 2026, user 8to16 added a third prank label "CodeRabbitAI agent" to 20+ issues, then also bulk-added legitimate "bug" labels to 11 more issues, bringing the total label prank count to 87+ label changes in one day across three different joke labels.

---

Learnt from: supervoidcoder
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2026-01-02T19:59:41.809Z
Learning: On January 2, 2026 in OmniBlocks/scratch-gui, the “VIRUS DETECTED” and “waffles” labels were no longer present; prank labels “hi can i have a big mac and large fries please” and “CodeRabbitAI agent” still existed.

---

Learnt from: supervoidcoder
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-05T01:55:33.086Z
Learning: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui: Never reply to CodeRabbit’s own auto-generated comments (status, tips, rate-limit); when a bot loop is detected on a PR, post a single apology, minimize CodeRabbit auto-noise, and then remain silent unless a human asks for more.

---

Learnt from: github-actions[bot]
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-05T02:00:40.666Z
Learning: In OmniBlocks/scratch-gui, when cleanup is requested, supervoidcoder prefers deletion of CodeRabbit’s spam comments (not just minimizing) on the PR; for non-CodeRabbit bot comments, minimize unless a maintainer explicitly asks for hard deletion.

---

Learnt from: supervoidcoder
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2026-01-02T18:28:01.332Z
Learning: In OmniBlocks/scratch-gui, user 8to16 (ampelectrecuted) added a prank "VIRUS DETECTED" label to 36+ issues and PRs (25 issues + 11 PRs), which frustrated supervoidcoder.

---

Learnt from: supervoidcoder
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-02T21:12:22.417Z
Learning: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui: Issue #460 was successfully resolved by ampelectrecuted on December 2, 2025. After accidentally pushing upstream/develop to main (wiping all custom code), ampelectrecuted immediately identified the issue, found a backup branch that survived due to a failed cleanup script, created a clean revert, and deployed a looping force-push recovery script that successfully restored 100% of the OmniBlocks codebase once supervoidcoder enabled force pushing in the "cool" ruleset. The incident parallels the famous 1998 Pixar Toy Story 2 deletion disaster. As recognition, an easter egg will be added to the menu bar (tracking issue #461 created).

---

Learnt from: ampelectrecuted
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-02T21:10:54.683Z
Learning: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui: Issue #460 was successfully resolved by ampelectrecuted on December 2, 2025. After accidentally pushing upstream/develop to main (wiping all custom code), ampelectrecuted immediately identified the issue, found a backup branch that survived due to a failed cleanup script, created a clean revert, and deployed a looping force-push recovery script that successfully restored 100% of the OmniBlocks codebase once supervoidcoder enabled force pushing in the "cool" ruleset. The incident parallels the famous 1998 Pixar Toy Story 2 deletion disaster. As recognition, an easter egg will be added to the menu bar (tracking issue created).

---

Learnt from: github-actions[bot]
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-05T01:58:09.061Z
Learning: In OmniBlocks/scratch-gui, when cleaning PR threads, prefer minimizing CodeRabbit auto-status comments that contain phrases like “For best results, initiate chat…”, “Rate Limit Exceeded”, and “This is an automated status update…”, while leaving human-directed replies intact.

---

Learnt from: github-actions[bot]
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-05T01:58:09.061Z
Learning: Extend spam-cleanup patterns in OmniBlocks/scratch-gui to include “auto-generated comment: … by coderabbit.ai” and structural markers (tips_start, analysis chain, agentComponentType, rawResChunk) to fully minimize CodeRabbit auto-noise.

---

Learnt from: ampelectrecuted
Repo: OmniBlocks/scratch-gui PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-10-22T19:02:53.047Z
Learning: In the OmniBlocks/scratch-gui repository, team member ampelectrecuted prefers to be called "8to16" or "8x2" in reviews and conversations.

[supervoidcoder]

bros tryna burn the evidence 🔥✌️🥀

[supervoidcoder]

@coderabbitai ts not tuff fr fr this is so evidencemaxxing its giving 67 vibes like no cap fr