From b3eb6e6f868b6d04e291795995e543f6900b13e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sergei Shirokov Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 18:57:21 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] minor comment --- .../examples/example_07_polymorphic_alloc_deleter.cpp | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/cetlvast/suites/docs/examples/example_07_polymorphic_alloc_deleter.cpp b/cetlvast/suites/docs/examples/example_07_polymorphic_alloc_deleter.cpp index 17de607..fce4718 100644 --- a/cetlvast/suites/docs/examples/example_07_polymorphic_alloc_deleter.cpp +++ b/cetlvast/suites/docs/examples/example_07_polymorphic_alloc_deleter.cpp @@ -237,7 +237,11 @@ TEST_F(example_07_polymorphic_alloc_deleter, example_usage_2) auto obj0 = cetl::pmr::InterfaceFactory::make_unique(alloc, "obj0", 4U); std::cout << "Obj0 id : " << obj0->id() << std::endl; -/* + + // Commented b/c of current limitation of our `cetl::pmr::function`. + // Probably PMR support is needed at `cetl::unbounded_variant` (which we use inside the `function`), + // so that it will be possible to nest one deleter inside another one. + /* auto obj1 = cetl::pmr::InterfaceFactory::make_unique(alloc, "obj1", 4U); { std::cout << "Obj1 id : " << obj1->id() << std::endl; @@ -257,6 +261,6 @@ TEST_F(example_07_polymorphic_alloc_deleter, example_usage_2) std::cout << "Obj3 name : " << obj3->name() << std::endl; std::cout << std::endl; } -*/ + */ //![example_usage_2] }