We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hello,
From this line I can see 32 points (64/2 for complex numbers) will get a pulse width of 50us (the lead-in).
But if I pass 60 as duration, from oscilloscope I can get a pulse almost 50us.
duration
I also noticed that tx_devider will affect the width of pulse.
I need to control as prcise as possible for pulse width, so how to compute an precise pulse width here ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Hello,
From this line I can see 32 points (64/2 for complex numbers) will get a pulse width of 50us (the lead-in).
But if I pass 60 as
duration
, from oscilloscope I can get a pulse almost 50us.I also noticed that tx_devider will affect the width of pulse.
I need to control as prcise as possible for pulse width, so how to compute an precise pulse width here ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: