SSP compliance for exported .SSD files? #1186
-
|
Hi, in my naivety I was just wondering for the reason of adding additional elements (as per the schema /master/schema/oms.xsd) to the SSD when exporting it from OMS? Since this breaks the SSP compliance (checking the .ssd with the associated schema fails)? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
The additional elements are part of vendor specific annotations and shouldn't break the ssp compliance. However, maybe we are doing something slightly wrong. @arun3688 can you check that? The reason for us introducing those elements is that the SSP standard group couldn't agree on a way to describe solver related model information and it was removed last minute form the standard (back then). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@Fredrik1Haider As lennart said the additional elements are part of vendor specific annotation and these additional elements belong to |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Okay, then I will have to look over my methodology for compliance checking. Thank you for a quick response! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
@Fredrik1Haider As lennart said the additional elements are part of vendor specific annotation and these additional elements belong to
oms:SimulationInformationand they are valid according to ssp specification