Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
57 lines (34 loc) · 4.19 KB

0005-Containerization.md

File metadata and controls

57 lines (34 loc) · 4.19 KB
Raw

5. Containerization

Date: 2023-09-13

Status

Accepted

Context

For the solution strategy of the Online Trip Management Dashboard, we are faced with architectural decision concerning packaging and managing the application.

Decision

After careful evaluation of our application's requirements, scalability needs, and deployment complexity, we have decided to adopt containerization using Docker and orchestration using Kubernetes.

Reasons for Choosing Docker and Kubernetes:

  1. Isolation and Portability: Docker containers provide a high degree of application isolation, ensuring that dependencies and configurations are consistent across various environments. This portability simplifies development and testing workflows.

  2. Scalability: Kubernetes offers robust scaling capabilities, allowing us to effortlessly scale our application horizontally based on demand. This is critical for handling fluctuations in user traffic, especially during peak travel seasons.

  3. Resource Efficiency: Containers, compared to traditional virtual machines, are more resource-efficient. They have lower overhead and faster startup times, optimizing resource utilization and reducing infrastructure costs.

  4. Orchestration: Kubernetes simplifies the management of containerized applications by automating tasks such as load balancing, health checks, and rolling updates. This ensures the application's reliability and availability.

  5. Self-Healing: Kubernetes includes self-healing features that automatically restart failed containers or reschedule them to healthy nodes, reducing downtime and enhancing system reliability.

  6. Declarative Configuration: Kubernetes uses a declarative approach to define the desired state of the application, making it easier to manage and version control infrastructure configurations.

  7. Ecosystem and Community: Docker and Kubernetes have large and active communities, providing access to a wealth of tools, resources, and best practices. This fosters innovation and support for our development efforts.

  8. Cloud-Native Compatibility: Docker and Kubernetes are well-suited for cloud-native application development, allowing seamless integration with cloud services and microservices architectures.

Consequences

While the decision to use Docker and Kubernetes offers numerous advantages, it also comes with certain consequences and considerations:

  1. Learning Curve: The team may need to invest time in learning Docker and Kubernetes concepts and best practices, which can be initially challenging.

  2. Infrastructure Complexity: Managing a Kubernetes cluster and infrastructure comes with complexity and operational overhead. We need to allocate resources for cluster management and monitoring.

  3. Resource Planning: Proper resource planning and optimization are required to ensure efficient use of cluster resources and cost control.

  4. Deployment Process: Setting up automated CI/CD pipelines for Docker containers and Kubernetes manifests is essential for streamlined deployment and updates.

  5. Security: Implementing security measures and best practices for containerized applications is crucial to prevent vulnerabilities.

In summary, the decision to containerize our application using Docker and orchestrate it with Kubernetes aligns with our goals of achieving scalability, portability, and efficient resource utilization. While there are challenges, the benefits of enhanced deployment management, resource efficiency, and scalability make Docker and Kubernetes suitable choices for our project's infrastructure.

References