Skip to content

Add support to use AlphaFold3 command line outputs in addition to AlphaFold3 Server outputs #4

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
phupe opened this issue Dec 18, 2024 · 7 comments

Comments

@phupe
Copy link

phupe commented Dec 18, 2024

AlphaBridge is really great, thanks for making this tool available.

Is there any plan to add support to use AlphaFold3 command line outputs in addition to AlphaFold3 Server outputs as filenames and json entries are not extacly the same.

Thanks.

@drlemmus
Copy link
Member

Yes, this is in the works, but I cannot give you an ETA.

@phupe
Copy link
Author

phupe commented Dec 19, 2024

This is a great news thats this functionnality is on its way.

@phupe
Copy link
Author

phupe commented Jan 30, 2025

Hi, any news on this implementation? Thanks a lot.

@ruslan-uoc
Copy link

ruslan-uoc commented Feb 5, 2025

Hi! I made a fork of the original AlphaBridge repository with enabled support for local installation of AlphaFold3 output. It's a very "crutch"-like solution that simply masks AF3 output as the output of AlphaFold Server and currently doesn't have support for ligands, but it works for proteins.

https://github.com/ruslan-uoc/AlphaBridge-AF3LocalPatch.git

AlphaBridge is great and I am looking forward for the implementation of this functionality from the authors of the original paper, but until then, I hope it will be of some help.

Cheers!

@Dan-salv
Copy link
Collaborator

Dan-salv commented Feb 5, 2025

Sorry for the delay in my response! Thank you for your feedback and for sharing your fork with the community,it’s great to see such engagement. I’m currently working on addressing this issue, alongside adding support for ligands and post-translational modifications. You can expect an update with these improvements by the end of this month.

@phupe
Copy link
Author

phupe commented Feb 10, 2025

Thanks @ruslan-uoc and @Dan-salv for this information!

@Dan-salv
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks @ruslan-uoc and @Dan-salv for this information!

Hi @phupe , I think i replied to you already by mail, but the 'Trunk branch' provides support for the locally installed version output, so I am close the issue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants