You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
where $f$ denotes the given objective. In order to apply this function on $x\in\mathbb{R}^{M\times N\times d}$ we would transform $x$ via reshaping to $\tilde{x}\in\mathbb{R}^{(M\cdot N) \times d}$ and use this as the input. However, this amounts to applying $f$ to $M\cdot N$ vectors simultaneously. This is handy and quick for loss functions that are easy to evaluate, but problematic for memory-heavy loss functions. There we would need a batching strategy so that the loss is successively applied to sub-batches of $\tilde{x}$.
This discussion was converted from issue #3 on May 19, 2023 10:10.
Heading
Bold
Italic
Quote
Code
Link
Numbered list
Unordered list
Task list
Attach files
Mention
Reference
Menu
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
In bc69cd0 the multirun strategy via$M\times N\times d$ particles was introduced. In the typical use case we assume a function
where$f$ denotes the given objective. In order to apply this function on $x\in\mathbb{R}^{M\times N\times d}$ we would transform $x$ via reshaping to $\tilde{x}\in\mathbb{R}^{(M\cdot N) \times d}$ and use this as the input. However, this amounts to applying $f$ to $M\cdot N$ vectors simultaneously. This is handy and quick for loss functions that are easy to evaluate, but problematic for memory-heavy loss functions. There we would need a batching strategy so that the loss is successively applied to sub-batches of $\tilde{x}$ .
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions