From 588c67e9e8962132c87002ab86ab288a5aca72a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Elisabeth Waczek <140592956+EWaczek@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 11:01:23 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] correct footnote --- cntr-monitor/content/en/issues/2024/posts/1_dual-use.mdx | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/cntr-monitor/content/en/issues/2024/posts/1_dual-use.mdx b/cntr-monitor/content/en/issues/2024/posts/1_dual-use.mdx index 98aba14a..68bbf885 100644 --- a/cntr-monitor/content/en/issues/2024/posts/1_dual-use.mdx +++ b/cntr-monitor/content/en/issues/2024/posts/1_dual-use.mdx @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ The following chapters take up all these facets. The chapters on emerging disrup [^6]: European Union. (2023, October 20). Compilation of national control lists under Article 9(4) of Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2021 setting up a Union regime for the control of exports, brokering, technical assistance, transit and transfer of dual-use items (C/2023/441). Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:C_202300441 [^7]: Joyner, D. (2004). Restructuring the multilateral export control regime system. Journal of conflict and security law, 9, 181–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/9.2.181 [^8]: The German Ethics Council. (2024, May 7). Biosecurity – Freedom and Responsibility of Research. https://www.ethikrat.org/en/publications/opinions/biosecurity/ -[^9]: Gemeinsamer Ausschuss zum Umgang mit sicherheitsrelevanter Forschung. (2022, November 28). Scientific Freedom and Scientfic Responsibility Recommendations for Handling of Security – Relevant Research. Leopoldina and DFG. https://www.security-relevant-research.org/publication-scientificfreedom2022/ +[^9]: Gemeinsamer Ausschuss zum Umgang mit sicherheitsrelevanter Forschung. (2022, November 28). Scientific Freedom and Scientfic Responsibility Recommendations for Handling of Security-Relevant Research. Leopoldina and DFG. https://www.security-relevant-research.org/publication-scientificfreedom2022/ [^10]: See Jakob, U., Kraemer, F., Kraus, F., Lengauer, T. (2024). Applying Ethics in the Handling of Dual Use Research: The Case of Germany, Research Ethics, published online June 10, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161241261044. [^11]: Cf., among others, Marauhn, T. (2014). Global governance of dual-use trade: The contribution of international law. In O. Meier (Ed.), Technology Transfers and Non-Proliferation: Between control and cooperation (pp. 45–75). Routledge. [^12]: Schweizer Eidgenossenschaft. (1976, 4. Mai). Übereinkommen über das Verbot der Entwicklung, Herstellung und Lagerung bakteriologischer (biologischer) Waffen und von Toxinwaffen sowie über die Vernichtung solcher Waffen (AS 1976 1438). Schweizer Eidgenossenschaft. https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/1976/1438_1439_1439/de; Schweizer Eidgenossenschaft. (1997, 29. April). Übereinkommen über das Verbot der Entwicklung, Herstellung, Lagerung und des Einsatzes chemischer Waffen und über die Vernichtung solcher Waffen (AS 1998 335). Schweizer Eidgenossenschaft. https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/1998/335_335_335/de; Krutzsch, W., Trapp, R. (1994). A Commentary on the Chemical Weapons Convention, Dordrecht et al.: Martinus Nijhoff, 20-44; Pearson, G.S. (2000). The CWC general purpose criterion: how to implement?. The CBW Conventions Bulletin, 49, 1–7. https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/meselsonarchive/files/200049_cbwcb49.pdf