You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In this case the text has a crucial clause missing from the logical - all members must be the same species. You can't express this in OWL without putting species in the domain of discourse.
This leads to the following presumably unintended inference:
I recommend using robot plus hermit with the option to fail on new entailed equivalence between named classes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A material entity that has as parts two or more organisms, viruses, or viroids of the same species and no members of any other species.
EquivalentTo
'collection of organisms'
and ('has member' min 2 'organism or virus or viroid')
The text and logical defs don't match, which is a bad sign. See https://douroucouli.wordpress.com/2019/07/08/ontotip-write-simple-concise-clear-operational-textual-definitions/
In this case the text has a crucial clause missing from the logical - all members must be the same species. You can't express this in OWL without putting species in the domain of discourse.
This leads to the following presumably unintended inference:
I recommend using robot plus hermit with the option to fail on new entailed equivalence between named classes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: