You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Maybe I just need to decrease the RMSD tolerance in unique.py. Bringing this to your attention because I did not expect unique.py to describe these structures as not unique and I was surprised by the difference in RMSD assigned by unique.py vs align in chimeraX.
Another example of where the results of unique.py are surprising. Using RMSD threshold 0.01 we, unique.py assigns
there are 3 structures similar to 04_opt: grey in screenshot below
07_opt (RMSD = 0.008) red in screenshot below
09_opt (RMSD = 0.000)
13_opt (RMSD = 0.000)
there are 2 structures similar to 05_opt: black in screenshot below
grey-vs-red is assigned identical, despite a 90 degree rotation about the C-C(aryl) bond
grey-vs-black is assigned inequivalent, even though there is only a small nudge to the amide bond.
I am getting unexpected behavior with unique.py it characterizes the following four files as not unique using the default RMSD cutoff.
If we set 01_opt as the reference structure, it is outputting RMSDs of
04_opt (RMSD = 0.135)
05_opt (RMSD = 0.022)
06_opt (RMSD = 0.149)
when I open these files in ChimeraX and use the align function
align #2 toAtoms #1
I get much larger RMSDs04_opt (RMSD = 1.887)
05_opt (RMSD = 1.896)
06_opt (RMSD = 2.189)
Maybe I just need to decrease the RMSD tolerance in unique.py. Bringing this to your attention because I did not expect unique.py to describe these structures as not unique and I was surprised by the difference in RMSD assigned by unique.py vs align in chimeraX.
04_no_cat_int_cis_01_opt.txt
04_no_cat_int_cis_04_opt.txt
04_no_cat_int_cis_05_opt.txt
04_no_cat_int_cis_06_opt.txt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: