Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update conventions to use No Op instead of Noop #622

Open
OroArmor opened this issue Jul 25, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Update conventions to use No Op instead of Noop #622

OroArmor opened this issue Jul 25, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
documentation improvements or additions to documentation good first issue good for new contributors t: refactor proposes a refactor

Comments

@OroArmor
Copy link
Member 

          looks like these are inconsistent, i prefer NO_OP over NOOP since i think it's more understandable if you haven't heard the phrase no-op before but i'd like to know what others think

Originally posted by @ix0rai in #621 (comment)
@OroArmor OroArmor added documentation improvements or additions to documentation good first issue good for new contributors t: refactor proposes a refactor labels Jul 25, 2024
@Hex4dec
Copy link

Hex4dec commented Jul 27, 2024

I'd like it to be NOP but that's only because I like C and Assembly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
documentation improvements or additions to documentation good first issue good for new contributors t: refactor proposes a refactor
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@OroArmor @Hex4dec