Skip to content

JOSS review - Software paper #61

@snjsomnath

Description

@snjsomnath

The authors have provided a clear summary and a statement of need. However, there is no mention of comparing it to other commonly used tools or software packages. Since the authors have mentioned "researchers" and "planners" as the target users, a comparison to other tools used by researchers and planners is expected. This could be combined with the state of the field, where tools like EnergyPlus and UrbanOpt (and/or DragonFly tools) are used.

The paper has some formatting issues Lines 58,59
Missing citations Line 53

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions