Hi @victoriastodden,
thank you very much for your excellent article. It was a pleasure to read and I was impressed by the level of rigor that went into making this study itself reproducible. However, as I now went through the article again to present your findings in a seminar in our lab next week, I found one open question for which I could not find the answer in the article or this supplementary material.
In the flow-chart of the 2011-2012 study methodology, you separate the phase 2 papers into the categories "likely to be reproducible by us", "potentially reproducible given more resources than we had", and "not likely to reproduce". What were the criteria that you used for making this distinction?
Best Regards
Christopher