Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chapter 9 #56

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

chapter 9 #56

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

kathyle9
Copy link
Member

@kathyle9 kathyle9 commented Feb 8, 2021

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@jjgray jjgray left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me with one caveat!

A few files look like they may be back-peddling to old versions. Please check, then I can approve.

"if not os.getenv(\"DEBUG\"):\n",
" parser = RosettaScriptsParser()\n",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kathyle9 @lyskov @jadolfbr can you guys check this edit? not sure this is related to adding in Ch 9

@@ -366,7 +369,7 @@
"name": "python",
"nbconvert_exporter": "python",
"pygments_lexer": "ipython3",
"version": "3.7.6"
"version": "3.6.1"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in fact this looks like a clue that the PR clobbers a newer version of this file with an older version. please check.

@@ -239,8 +239,9 @@
"mm.set_chi(True)\n",
"minmover.set_movemap(mm)\n",
"\n",
"for i in range(1, 5):\n",
" minmover.apply(p)\n",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same comment...clobbering new file with old?

@jadolfbr
Copy link
Member

As Jeff said, I think maybe you need to pull in master before these changes? Chapter 10 - working with density looks mangled somehow. I think this was branched off of an older version...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants