ordering of parameters in multiplication model P(Q)S(Q) (Trac #760)

[RichardHeenan]

Would be very nice if parameter list for P(Q)S(Q) was not in alphabetic order but remained in the order for the individual models, with P(Q) appearing first, then S(Q).

Migrated from http://trac.sasview.org/ticket/760

{
    "status": "closed",
    "changetime": "2018-03-04T17:02:38",
    "_ts": "2018-03-04 17:02:38.516523+00:00",
    "description": "\nWould be very nice if parameter list for P(Q)S(Q) was not in alphabetic order but remained in the order for the individual models, with P(Q) appearing first, then S(Q).",
    "reporter": "richardh",
    "cc": "",
    "resolution": "fixed",
    "workpackage": "SasView Bug Fixing",
    "time": "2016-10-10T18:50:24",
    "component": "SasView",
    "summary": "ordering of parameters in multiplication model P(Q)S(Q)",
    "priority": "trivial",
    "keywords": "",
    "milestone": "SasView 4.1.0",
    "owner": "Paul Kienzle <pkienzle@gmail.com",
    "type": "defect"
}

[sasview-bot]

Trac update at 2016/10/13 05:01:30:

• Paul Kienzle <pkienzle@gmail.com commented:

In changeset 313c5c9:

#!CommitTicketReference repository="sasview" revision="313c5c92691602529afcffa8e76988a7cf6397b9"
use product model from sasmodels rather than sasview. Fixes #680, #876

• Paul Kienzle <pkienzle@gmail.com changed owner from "" to "Paul Kienzle pkienzle@gmail.com"
• Paul Kienzle <pkienzle@gmail.com changed resolution from "" to "fixed"
• Paul Kienzle <pkienzle@gmail.com changed status from "new" to "closed"

[butlerpd]

Trac update at 2018/03/04 17:02:38: butler changed milestone from "SasView Next Release +1" to "SasView 4.1.0"