You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm planning to migrate a large codebase from a home-grown logging system (based on MonadLogger) to katip.
However, I was curious if katip scribes have been optimized on the lines of fast-logger, which led to creation of TimedFastLogger? There was a paper about this somewhere I had read a long time ago -- IIRC the authors of fast-logger had found a hotspot in generating & formatting timestamps for log messages and optimized it heavily.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I don't know about the paper you're referencing but if you look at the definition of a Scribe it's very generally specified. Your logging function gets an item with a timestamp so you could choose an appropriate way to render the timestamps. Does that get you started in the right direction?
I'm planning to migrate a large codebase from a home-grown logging system (based on MonadLogger) to
katip
.However, I was curious if katip scribes have been optimized on the lines of
fast-logger
, which led to creation ofTimedFastLogger
? There was a paper about this somewhere I had read a long time ago -- IIRC the authors of fast-logger had found a hotspot in generating & formatting timestamps for log messages and optimized it heavily.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: