CatBoostLSS implementation still of interest? #10
StatMixedML
started this conversation in
Polls
Replies: 1 comment
-
Thanks for your work on this @StatMixedML. I voted yes, as Catboost currently still has the best-out-the-box results (without any tuning). However, insofar as there is a lot of work required to maintain each of CatBoostLSS, LightGBMLSS, and XGBoostLSS, it would probably make more sense to focus on one of them and make it a best-in-class library rather than dividing efforts across all three. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Dear Community,
Given that CatBoost does not support GPU training of custom loss functions, I want to have your opinion on whether or not a CatBoostLSS implementation would still be of interest. Let me know!
1 vote ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions