Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SEP 002 -- SEP Template Document #2

Open
graik opened this issue Oct 8, 2015 · 6 comments
Open

SEP 002 -- SEP Template Document #2

graik opened this issue Oct 8, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@graik
Copy link
Contributor

graik commented Oct 8, 2015

SEP 002 -- SEP Template Document

< Note 1: remove/replace all instructions given within "< >" >
< ❗ Note 2: you really need to look at this in raw / editing mode πŸ˜ƒ >
< Note 3: download the raw template from: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/SynBioDex/SEPs/master/sep_002_template.md >

SEP
Title SEP Template Document <replace with your short descriptive title (44 character max)>
Authors <Author1 name (author1mail at xxmail com), Author2 name (author mail at yyy com)>
Editor
Type Process
SBOL Version <SBOL version this proposal should apply to; remove line if Type==Process>
Replaces <list SEP(s) this proposal would replace, otherwise remove line. E.g. SEP #1>
Status Draft
Created 08-Oct-2015
Last modified 08-Oct-2015

Abstract

< insert short summary >

Table of Contents

1. Rationale

< insert motivation / rational, keep it brief >

2. Specification

< give detailed specification, can be split up into more than one section if useful >
< refer to other SEPs like this: This SEP is much better than SEP #1>

2.1 optional sub-point

< sub-divide specification section if useful >

2.2 optional sub-point

< sub-divide specification section if useful >

3. Example or Use Case

< Describe brief examples or use cases >

4. Backwards Compatibility

< discuss compatibility issues and how to solve them; remove this section if this doesn't apply >
< e.g. in case of procedure SEP >

5. Discussion

5.1 discussion point

< Summarize discussion, also represent dissenting opinions >

5.2 discussion point

References

< list references as follows >

< refer to these references in the text as, e.g. SBOL or 1 >

Copyright

< SEPs should generally be public domain; replace names as needed. If necessary, change to a different license (typically another CC license) >

CC0
To the extent possible under law, SBOL developers has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to SEP 002. This work is published from: United States.

@graik
Copy link
Contributor Author

graik commented Oct 9, 2015

Since normal users won't have editing rights on this issue tracker, and thus won't be able to see the markdown code, I have checked in a copy of the raw markdown file as sep_002_template.md.

@jakebeal
Copy link
Contributor

Labelling as CC0 rather than public domain for better legal compatibility, per discussion with Raik.

@graik
Copy link
Contributor Author

graik commented Oct 16, 2015

Added "Editor" field to preamble. Following Michal's suggestion (see SEP #1).

@graik
Copy link
Contributor Author

graik commented Feb 7, 2016

changed Type : Procedure -> Type: Process

@graik graik added Accepted and removed Draft labels Mar 12, 2016
@graik
Copy link
Contributor Author

graik commented Mar 12, 2016

Voting closed on March 10th 2016. This SEP was accepted together with SEP #1.
Votes: 25
Accept: 25

@SynBioDex SynBioDex locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 12, 2016
@graik graik added the Active label Mar 20, 2016
@jamesamcl jamesamcl reopened this Oct 11, 2018
@palchicz
Copy link
Contributor

Closing in accordance with changes to SEP issue tracking rules detailed in SEP 001 bcbbcab#diff-44cec2aabf4c066f9a54ac4ef6634b9b

@palchicz palchicz reopened this Jan 21, 2019
@Fontanapink Fontanapink removed the Active label Mar 9, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants