Adapter definitions are too strict #217
olokobayusuf
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hey! My team is considering building a community adapter for running AI models with TanStack AI. For context on us, we're building a platform that allows developers to run arbitrary AI models by "compiling" them into self-contained binaries that can run anywhere.
The adapters guide states that we have to define model metadata ahead of time, listing things like model names, capabilities, options and so on. I totally get the design goals here (strong typing), but it them becomes impossible for devs to run a wider variety of models (especially if they are bringing these models themselves).
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions