You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When running transition model, the resulting data frame loses the index name (I'm guessing because of the concat). Is this worth preserving? This would be a simple fix, but not sure if it would break existing implementations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @bridwell, thanks for pointing this out. I agree that it should be fixed. It seems unlikely to break anything (and worth doing even if it did).
Is the concat you're referring to the one in transition.py#L468? I'm not sure exactly what's happening there, but it looks like the second DataFrame doesn't have a named index, which would as you say lead to the index name of the main table being dropped.
And probably fixing it at the source would fix urbansim_defaults too.
When running transition model, the resulting data frame loses the index name (I'm guessing because of the concat). Is this worth preserving? This would be a simple fix, but not sure if it would break existing implementations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: