Supply Chain Factors v1.2 missing 331314? #46
Answered
by
bl-young
gsdipietro
asked this question in
Q&A
-
|
There are no emission factors for Secondary Smelting and Alloying of Aluminum (331314). Is this correct? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Answered by
bl-young
May 16, 2023
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
Yes it is correct. The current release is based on a detail level commodity model. In these models, 331314 is only an industry and not a commodity (that is, both 331313 and 331314 produce the same commodity: 331313). As a result, in a commodity model, no factors are produced for 331314. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Answer selected by
WesIngwersen
-
|
Great, thank you.
…On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 9:38 AM Ben Young ***@***.***> wrote:
Yes it is correct. The current release is based on a detail level
commodity model
<https://github.com/USEPA/supply-chain-factors/blob/main/model-specs/USEEIOv2.1.19-GHG.yml#L10>.
In these models, 331314 is only an industry and not a commodity (that is,
both 331313 and 331314 produce the same commodity: 331313). As a result, in
a commodity model, no factors are produced for 331314.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#46 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AX2A33HVHX6QEISB7WQ6AQTXGN7LVANCNFSM6AAAAAAYDQJDRE>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***
com>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Yes it is correct. The current release is based on a detail level commodity model. In these models, 331314 is only an industry and not a commodity (that is, both 331313 and 331314 produce the same commodity: 331313). As a result, in a commodity model, no factors are produced for 331314.