You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
-Features Demo: up to 3 marks for each major feature presented
-Feature 1 presentation:
0-3 marks [3=Excellent, 2=Adequate, 1=Inadequate, 0=No feature]
Your mark:
-Feature 2 presentation:
0-3 marks [3=Excellent, 2=Adequate, 1=Inadequate, 0=No feature]
Your mark:
-Feature 3 presentation:
0-3 marks [3=Excellent, 2=Adequate, 1=Inadequate, 0=No feature]
Your mark:
Process[14 marks]:
-Team Introduction:
0-4 marks
[4=Presentation looks and sounds professional, all members are present]
[Each missing person, minus 1 mark]
[Note due to this year's special situation: you may or may not show your person in video. However voice participation is a mandatory minimum]
Your mark:
-Team communication, processes, standards, and techniques:
0-6 marks
[Each element 2 marks if presented professionally, 1 mark if presented adequately, 0 otherwise]
Your mark:
-Documentation
0-4 marks
[Overview, frontend + backend 2 marks if presented professionally, 1 mark if presented adequately, 0 otherwise]
Your mark:
Software Architecture[10 marks]:
-0-4 marks
[4=Architecture presented clearly, illustrated with sufficient diagrams, components and responsibilities shown clearly]
[-1 mark for each missing component]
Your mark:
Technologies used and technical challenges
-0-6 marks
[6=Technologies presented clearly, illustrated with sufficient diagrams/links/examples, technical challenges indicated clearly
Also a clear description what the team did to overcome those challenges]
[-2 marks for each missing component, -1 mark is component not presented clearly]
Your mark:
Participation[5 marks]
-Team asked at least two meaningful questions to other teams
-Q1 (2 marks)
-Q2 (2 marks)
-Questions were asked using a professional tone and body language (1 mark)