-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
notes.txt
54 lines (37 loc) · 2.52 KB
/
notes.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
# DAP and Waterspout Notes
## Model Notes
Steps 1-3 are the calibration phase - step 5 is the
anything omega is some kind of cost, usually in dollars/acre
xwater = applied water requirements - amount of water in applied water/acre that each crop needs after precip happen
p = price in dollars/ton
y = yield in tons/acre
xland = observed land use for each crop/region/year
omega water is cost in dollars/acre-foot
theta = supply elasticity - how much a change in price changes decisions of farmers to produce crops
sigma = elasticity of substitution - how much can we substitute non-water inputs (fertilizer, etc) to keep yields where we need them as we drop water
PMP is meant to cature factors that can't be explained economically.
objective function decreases the marginal value of each additional unit of land allocated to the same crop so that it doesn't all become the same thing that has the best value (like almonds)
then add constraints so that no crops disappear (which would mess up the model)
then a stress reduction constraint - they can't reduce the water below the expected amount needed for each unit of crop
then a huge block to get results
Can simplify the error handling code heavily
Currently it sets an error status on the output, but then uses the results from the previous year - if not previous year, it sets valuees to 0.
Resource flag checks tom make sure it uses either all of water or all of land or both (since one should be limiting)
Potential parameter for max amount of deficit irrigation.
## Interface Notes
Step 1. Linear Program
Step 2. Calibration
Step 3. Calibrated Model
Additional knob of climate change adjustment to productivity?
Cost of water
Price of crops
Water available
Land available
Stress on crops
Start with three knobs - we need to have a way to specify if knob adjustment is for all regions or specific regions
Water and Land specified per region
Prices and yields per crop (may still want to specify these per region for Washington?)
2. Land
Instead of providing amount of water, do a percentage, which would be based on the actual water requirements of the crops that are panted
The per-region water cutback is the number one most important thing - then yields and prices of crops
In order of importance: water cutback, land cutback (thesea are by region). Then yield and price controls (per-crop, not specifying per region right now). The model regions also will be aggregated into a cluster (such as our Delta "megaregions") - they may want to do controls per-megaregion and have the info applied to regions.