Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

More efficient DateTime field #2

Open
ts5746 opened this issue Apr 15, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

More efficient DateTime field #2

ts5746 opened this issue Apr 15, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request interoperability Impacts interoperability and backwards compatibility
Milestone
v2-development

Comments

@ts5746
Copy link
Contributor

ts5746 commented Apr 15, 2019

The current 7 bytes in the compressed encoding is not the most efficient for the DateTime field (see par. 4.3.1.1 of the specification). If the number of seconds since 1-1-2016 is used, 4 bytes are enough till 2150.
@ts5746 ts5746 added interoperability Impacts interoperability and backwards compatibility enhancement New feature or request labels Apr 15, 2019
@ts5746 ts5746 added this to the v2-development milestone Apr 15, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request interoperability Impacts interoperability and backwards compatibility
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v2-development
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ts5746