Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Landmask appearing in the labeled floes image #117

Open
danielmwatkins opened this issue Mar 27, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Landmask appearing in the labeled floes image #117

danielmwatkins opened this issue Mar 27, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@danielmwatkins
Copy link
Collaborator

I've been running the IFT-pipeline on a random sample of locations throughout the Arctic. I've run into lots of issues where the pipeline simply fails. Out of 189 cases, IFT-pipeline made it to the preprocessing step 148 times, and successfully made hdf5 files of the segmented image only 36 times (19% of the time).

There's some cases where it does an OK job, at least mainly finding sea ice floes. Case 007 below is about the best that the algorithm can do at the moment -- the segmented image mainly is showing identified floes aligned with real floes, albeit with a large negative area bias.

007_segmentation_results

Case 022 is stranger: there appears to be an issue where occasionally the dilated landmask gets labeled as a floe. This happens in
12 out of the 36 completed runs, so it's a pretty common issue.
022_segmentation_results

The land mask, for context:
image

The common issues show up all of our test regions, so I've attached a CSV with the specifications for the 21 Baffin Bay cases.
baffin_bay_100km_cases.csv

These cases were all run with the default settings of IFT.

@tdivoll
Copy link
Collaborator

tdivoll commented Jul 19, 2024

See this issue in the IFT.jl source package for context. May need to add a param to the CLI or Cylc based on image size.

@tdivoll tdivoll added this to the IFT Data Process milestone Jul 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants