Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Image Block: Advanced > Block Name doesn't effect List View #57944

Closed
jordesign opened this issue Jan 17, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Image Block: Advanced > Block Name doesn't effect List View #57944

jordesign opened this issue Jan 17, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
[Block] Image Affects the Image Block [Type] Bug An existing feature does not function as intended

Comments

@jordesign
Copy link
Contributor

Description

When adding a custom Block Name (under Advanced > Block Name) the new name isn't reflected on the Image Block in the list view.

Step-by-step reproduction instructions

  1. Add a new Page or Popst
  2. Insert an image block
  3. Go to the Block Settings > Advanced and add a 'Block Name'
  4. Open the list view to see the block (without a custom name)

Screenshots, screen recording, code snippet

Screenshot 2024-01-18 at 10 49 38 am

Environment info

WP 6.4.2
GB 17.5.0
Twenty Twenty-Four

Please confirm that you have searched existing issues in the repo.

Yes

Please confirm that you have tested with all plugins deactivated except Gutenberg.

Yes

@jordesign jordesign added [Type] Bug An existing feature does not function as intended [Block] Image Affects the Image Block labels Jan 17, 2024
@t-hamano
Copy link
Contributor

After investigating this problem, I found that this problem occurs in other blocks besides the Image block. I have summarized the cause of this problem and the tasks to be done in #57954, so I would like to close this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
[Block] Image Affects the Image Block [Type] Bug An existing feature does not function as intended
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants