Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

amd64 for linux missing on the release #85

Closed
dragon040 opened this issue Mar 8, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #86
Closed

amd64 for linux missing on the release #85

dragon040 opened this issue Mar 8, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #86

Comments

@dragon040
Copy link

Some how I am not able to see the release "packer-plugin-goss_v3.2.9_x5.0_linux_amd64.zip" on the list.

@FalcoSuessgott
Copy link
Collaborator

Yeah linux_amd64 is excluded in goreleaser, as recommended in hashicorps scaffolding template (https://github.com/hashicorp/packer-plugin-scaffolding/blob/bf869f2cc3ebfd3b520ddad5fb63f66144810fe0/.goreleaser.yml#L53). I cant really tell you how but it should nevertheless work for linux_amd64 systems as I have used it successfully locally and during CI.. did u give it a try?

@alfredkrohmer
Copy link

Yeah linux_amd64 is excluded in goreleaser, as recommended in hashicorps scaffolding template (https://github.com/hashicorp/packer-plugin-scaffolding/blob/bf869f2cc3ebfd3b520ddad5fb63f66144810fe0/.goreleaser.yml#L53)

The line you are referring to is already 4 years old, however, for this plugin, this was only added in the last release. Are you sure that this is a recommendation and not just an example?

I cant really tell you how but it should nevertheless work for linux_amd64 systems as I have used it successfully locally and during CI.. did u give it a try?

We have used it for several years now on linux_amd64 (locally and CI) and I would even bet that this is the main platform where this is used on. Please add it back.

@FalcoSuessgott
Copy link
Collaborator

I will reproduce and open a PR in the next days as soon as i have stable internet again

@FalcoSuessgott
Copy link
Collaborator

until #86 is merged u should be able to use v3.2.8

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants