-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
schedule.ipt
39 lines (39 loc) · 3.07 KB
/
schedule.ipt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
# start time -- the time and date that the experiment starts
# end time -- the time and data that the experiment finishes
# water level -- unit cm, means the distance from the soil surface to the water level, if unrestricted, specify as 0. if it is negative value, it is a snapshot of the
# Heat intensity -- unit w/m2, means the heat from the infrade lamp
# soil type -- 1,2,3 means the type of the soil applied.
# output -- if =1 the result will only be output for 60mm column, if=2 will output only for 90mm column, if =3 output for both, if =0 the result will not be output
# scale no -- specify which column in scale.dat does this schedule refers
# [Start time] [End Time] [Comment on the data] [Water level cm] [surface area] [soil thickness(m)] [porosity] [evt,coeffi] [te_coef] [tas606_coef] [time_surface_emerge] [Sequence] [Aero Resis.] [Tranlation (day)] [good or not]
#
# ------ this one is the dataset that works for the whole set of the results, worked for ali
# 2016/Feb/17 14:00, 2016/Apr/17 11:00, arcylic_large_pet , 3, 0.0095, 12000 , 2, 0.00005
## ------ this dataset is used to make sure that both has the same supernatant water on top, worked for compared with small evt results
# 2016/Feb/26 14:00, 2016/Apr/17 11:00, arcylic_large_pet_chop_stg1 , 3, 0.0095, 12000 , 2, 0.0005
# 2016/Apr/24 13:22, 2016/May/20 11:00, arcylic_small_pet , 3, 0.0095, 12000 , 1, 0.0005
#
#
#for first case
#
#
# for second case
# 17-02-26 8:04 y=8.06mm water level is close to tailings surface
# 17-03-12 14:07 y=14.48mm at the end of experiment
# according to the up data, porosity =0.35
# for second case
#
# for third case
# 17-03-21 12:15 y=7.47mm water level is close to tailings surface
# 17-04-02 10:40 y=21.5527mm at the end of the experiment
# according to the up data, porosity =0.35
# for second case
#---------- the above results works very well for fredlund suction sensor----------
# 2018/Mar/2 1:30, 2018/May/29 13:28 , bacteria , 3, 0.03141, 0.04 , 0.50, 3.4, 0.8, 18.6 , 2017/Apr/25 08:55,
# 2020/Mar/27 23:00, 2020/May/20 21:30 , subgrade, 4, 0.08745, 0.4 , 0.40, 3.4, 0.8, 18.6 , 2018/Dec/22 03:00,
#2020/Mar/30 23:00, 2020/May/25 21:30 , embankment, 4, 0.08745, 0.4 , 0.40, 3.4, 0.8, 18.6 , 2018/Dec/22 03:00,
2020/Sep/19 15:00, 2020/Dec/07 15:00 , embankment, 4, 0.08745, 0.04 , 0.40, 3.4, 0.8, 18.6 , 2018/Sep/06 15:00,
# 2018/Dec/21 23:00, 2019/Jan/10 09:00 , basin_c, 4, 0.09720, 0.04 , 0.50, 3.4, 0.8, 18.6 , 2018/Dec/22 00:58,
# 2017/Oct/23 21:40, 2017/Oct/29 14:03 , Marandoo_second , 3, 0.03225, 0.04 , 0.50, 3.4, 0.8, 18.6 , 2017/Oct/23 21:55,
# 2017/Oct/23 11:40, 2017/Oct/29 04:03 , Marandoo_third , 3, 0.03225, 0.04 , 0.50, 3.4, 0.8, 18.6 , 2017/Apr/25 08:55,
#