You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If two MS-features, e.g. within one sequence, have them same candidate sets, should the randomly sub-sampled candidate sets, e.g. used during training, be identical for both features?
Is it sufficient to calculate the average, e.g. top-k, accuracy over the sequences in the sample? Thereby we first calculate the average, e.g. top-k, accuracy over the sequence and subsequently average over the samples.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Answer to first question: I think it does not really matter. My experiments showed that we can even have different random candidate subsets each time a specific spectrum re-appears in a training sequence. Only in during testing this matters, but that we anyway do not randomly sub-sample.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: