Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open questions regarding implementation details #1

Open
bachi55 opened this issue Dec 10, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Open questions regarding implementation details #1

bachi55 opened this issue Dec 10, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@bachi55
Copy link
Member

bachi55 commented Dec 10, 2020

  • If two MS-features, e.g. within one sequence, have them same candidate sets, should the randomly sub-sampled candidate sets, e.g. used during training, be identical for both features?
  • Is it sufficient to calculate the average, e.g. top-k, accuracy over the sequences in the sample? Thereby we first calculate the average, e.g. top-k, accuracy over the sequence and subsequently average over the samples.
@bachi55 bachi55 self-assigned this Dec 10, 2020
@bachi55 bachi55 transferred this issue from another repository Apr 12, 2021
@bachi55 bachi55 transferred this issue from another repository Apr 14, 2021
@bachi55
Copy link
Member Author

bachi55 commented May 26, 2021

Answer to first question: I think it does not really matter. My experiments showed that we can even have different random candidate subsets each time a specific spectrum re-appears in a training sequence. Only in during testing this matters, but that we anyway do not randomly sub-sample.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant