Fulfillment Inbound API v2024-03-20. #744
Replies: 4 comments 7 replies
-
Can you guys give us any idea if you are able to review and merge pull requests, or is there some way we can help? Right now there is a PR #730 from @kevinvenclovas that addresses the the new Inbound Fulfillment, although it may not follow the same coding standards as the rest of the library, and has some additional changes outside of just the Inbound Fulfillment. Is that something you guys can look at merging, or do you need help due to time? I'd like to see this project continue and I'd be willing to dedicate some time to it, but it doesn't make sense for several of us to implement the new APIs individually and then only one of them get merged into the original project. Can you guys let us know your ideas about keeping the project up to date, and how we can help? Thanks, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Usually we merge fast but this branch so big and not same our sliced style
and will need big time to review and I don’t have that time now .
If you can help on adding new api but with same code style will be nice and
will merge fast for you
…On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 at 10:13 PM, Cw733 ***@***.***> wrote:
@abuzuhri <https://github.com/abuzuhri> @J-W-Chan
<https://github.com/J-W-Chan> @RenzoF <https://github.com/RenzoF>
Can you guys give us any idea if you are able to review and merge pull
requests, or is there some way we can help? Right now there is a PR #730
<#730> from
@kevinvenclovas <https://github.com/kevinvenclovas> that addresses the
the new Inbound Fulfillment, although it may not follow the same coding
standards as the rest of the library, and has some additional changes
outside of just the Inbound Fulfillment.
Is that something you guys can look at merging, or do you need help due to
time? I'd like to see this project continue and I'd be willing to dedicate
some time to it, but it doesn't make sense for several of us to implement
the new APIs and then only one of them get merged into the original project.
Can you guys let us know your ideas about keeping the project up to date,
and how we can help?
Thanks,
Casey
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#744 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA4IEBBEGWTANXPKWK2UCGLZLQR6HAVCNFSM6AAAAABKBGJ2ZWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTAMBQGE2TGMA>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
<abuzuhri/Amazon-SP-API-CSharp/repo-discussions/744/comments/10001530@
github.com>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hey, yes, I used the OpenAPI service to generate the API models. All other code follows the same coding style. Feel free to add the models directly to the project and remove the OpenAPI service. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Question about this: The new api does not support the getShipments endpoint where we can get shipments within a date range without shipment ids. This endpoint has not been deprecated as part of the migration, so we can potentially still use it. What do you recommend we do in this situation? Will this endpoint be deprecated eventually as well? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi, i got the following mail. Is there anything planned?
We have deprecated 10 operations in Fulfillment Inbound API v0 with a removal date of December 20, 2024:
• createInboundShipmentPlan
• updateInboundShipment
• createInboundShipment
• getPreorderInfo
• confirmPreorder
• getTransportDetails
• putTransportDetails
• voidTransport
• estimateTransport
• confirmTransport
Thanx,
Tobias
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions