Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Taxonomy ITIS Species Classifier #529

Open
4 tasks done
dwalt opened this issue Feb 17, 2023 · 4 comments
Open
4 tasks done

Taxonomy ITIS Species Classifier #529

dwalt opened this issue Feb 17, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@dwalt
Copy link
Collaborator

dwalt commented Feb 17, 2023

Identifying the classifier of a species or sub-species is important in understanding the classification. This can be important when there is a divergence of opinion in classifications, to understand what classification the author used in species identification.

Recommend the ITIS download include the name and date of the classifier as a date instance. The name of the classifier can be put in the description field. Suggest using "adopted" for a dateType.

  • Add taxonAuthor to itis response
  • Add updateDate to itis response
  • Display taxonAuthor as part of search result details
  • Display date updated as part of search result details
@hmaier-fws
Copy link
Contributor

It looks like ITIS calls this the taxonAuthor See: https://services.itis.gov/?q=tsn:180328

@jwaspin jwaspin self-assigned this Feb 21, 2024
@jwaspin jwaspin linked a pull request Feb 21, 2024 that will close this issue
@jwaspin
Copy link
Contributor

jwaspin commented Feb 21, 2024

@dwalt I added a checklist of things that I did as part of this. I wasn't sure exactly what you were saying here so for now I just grabbed those fields and am displaying them in the results.

Screenshot

@dwalt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dwalt commented Feb 22, 2024

Update date may have been a poor choice of names. I think the date here was intended to be an approximate year of classification. In the case of Puma concolor, the classifier would be Linnaeus and the date of classification was 1771. If there were changes to the classification we would like to know the date of last classification change. I'm not sure we can get this from ITIS.

@hmaier-fws
Copy link
Contributor

hmaier-fws commented Feb 22, 2024

There is an added complication in that ITIS includes the date as part of the "taxonAuthor" field. But, also that not all taxa include the publication date (this is actually the publication date of when the species was first described in the scientific literature). See the entry for Salix rotundifolia var. dodgeana this does not include a publication date and is also an example showing multiple authors (the initial description by "Rydb." and a later reclassification by "A.E. Murray")

The reason the names are handled differently is that this is not an issue of "classification" (biological taxonomy) but one of naming conventions (biological nomenclature). The naming of plants, animals, and bacteria are under the jurisdiction of different entities, with different rules and conventions. The same is true of "classification" (taxonomy); it's possible that a single organism could be classified differently, depending upon the system used (see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_systems_of_plant_taxonomy).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants