-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 106
delete-cpu-limit #535
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
delete-cpu-limit #535
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces resource configuration for the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/extra/monitoring/templates/vm/vmcluster.yaml (1)
38-42
: Consider reviewing memory limits for production workloads.The current memory limit of 1000Mi might be restrictive for the
vmstorage
component, especially:
- During high cardinality metrics ingestion
- When handling concurrent queries
- During background compaction operations
Consider:
- Implementing horizontal pod autoscaling based on memory usage
- Monitoring memory usage patterns in production to determine optimal limits
- Implementing a graduated limit increase strategy based on workload metrics
resources: | ||
limits: | ||
memory: 1000Mi | ||
requests: | ||
cpu: 100m | ||
memory: 500Mi |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Resource configuration inconsistency found in vminsert
component
Looking at the complete VMCluster configuration, I notice that while vmselect
and vmstorage
have consistent resource configurations (memory limits/requests and CPU requests without CPU limits), the vminsert
component has empty resource specifications (resources: {}
). This inconsistency should be addressed for better resource management across all components.
vminsert
component at line 10 has empty resource specifications, while other components have standardized configurations- Consider applying the same resource pattern to
vminsert
:resources: limits: memory: 1000Mi requests: cpu: 100m memory: 500Mi
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Resource configuration aligns with PR objective.
The resource configuration correctly omits CPU limits while maintaining memory limits and requests, which aligns with the PR objective to delete CPU limits. The values are consistent with the existing vmselect
configuration.
Let's verify if similar resource configurations should be applied to vminsert
for consistency:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check resource configurations across VictoriaMetrics deployments
# Look for any other VMCluster configurations that might need similar updates
# Search for VMCluster configurations
rg -l "kind:\s*VMCluster" --type yaml
# Search for resource configurations in VMCluster components
rg "vm(insert|select|storage):\s*\n\s*(\w+:\s*\w+\s*)*\s*resources:" --type yaml -A 10
Length of output: 559
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's modify the search pattern to find resource configurations in VMCluster components
# Search in the specific vmcluster.yaml file we're reviewing
cat packages/extra/monitoring/templates/vm/vmcluster.yaml
Length of output: 1287
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Summary by CodeRabbit
vmstorage
component.