Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Naming of fields in CartesianClosed Functor #344

Open
JacquesCarette opened this issue Mar 25, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Naming of fields in CartesianClosed Functor #344

JacquesCarette opened this issue Mar 25, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@JacquesCarette
Copy link
Collaborator

See PR #339 by @Trebor-Huang for the details. The current names are sub-optimal.
@Trebor-Huang
Copy link
Contributor

After looking at some materials, I think a good candidate is ^-comp standing for comprison maps. Generally, when some functor is expected to respect some structure, there's often already a onesided map. So we can similarly have ×-comp which is roughly F(X×Y) → FX × FY etc.

@JacquesCarette
Copy link
Collaborator Author

(Sorry for the slowness, my term was crazy. Slowly emerging now.)

Comparing with monoidal functor, I think that ^-homo would perhaps be an even better name?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@JacquesCarette @Trebor-Huang