When saving a suborganization as a funder, consider saving also the actual organization name

[ajnyga]

When saving a suborganization, the name of the actual organization is not saved anywhere. With the DOI you can of course query the crossref API and find out what the organization is, but for visual purposes we should consider saving the name of the organization so that we can show it on the article page and maybe also elsewhere.

Suggested format when saving:
Organization Name: Suborganization Name

What do you think @bozana?

[bozana]

@ajnyga, could you please remind me what exactly is saved for suborganization and what for organization? There is the 'funderName' setting_name for both, or?

[ajnyga]

Hi,

Yes, basically both options are saved as funderName to funder_settings. Techinically this is not a problem. Crossref can see the relation of the DOI to the main organization and so can probably OpenAIRE and others. The problem I think is humans :D, for us the suborganization name may not tell enough when presented without the name of the main organization.

So I don't know. Maybe we should always save the main organization as the funderName and add a new setting called funderSubName which has the label for the suborganization. The DOI is of course always the DOI for the suborganiazation, but as I said, I do not think the DOI is the problem, just the name/label.

Also with the old data where the suborganization has been saved as the funderName, I do not think much harm has been done. They are just missing the name of the main organization.

What do you think? I actually think this would be an easy thing to add. Not seeing much problems.

[bozana]

Yes, OK... 👍