Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Data provider address "Internet" does not work #2300

Open
4 of 5 tasks
JimMadge opened this issue Nov 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
4 of 5 tasks

Data provider address "Internet" does not work #2300

JimMadge opened this issue Nov 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Problem when deploying a Data Safe Haven.

Comments

@JimMadge
Copy link
Member

✅ Checklist

  • I have searched open and closed issues for duplicates.
  • This is a problem observed when deploying a Data Safe Haven.
  • I can reproduce this with the latest version.
  • I have read through the documentation.
  • This isn't an open-ended question (open a discussion if it is).

💻 System information

  • Data Safe Haven version: develop (24fbad9)

📦 Packages

List of packages
acme==2.10.0
annotated-types==0.7.0
appdirs==1.4.4
Arpeggio==2.0.2
attrs==24.2.0
azure-common==1.1.28
azure-core==1.32.0
azure-identity==1.19.0
azure-keyvault-certificates==4.9.0
azure-keyvault-keys==4.10.0
azure-keyvault-secrets==4.9.0
azure-mgmt-compute==33.0.0
azure-mgmt-containerinstance==10.1.0
azure-mgmt-core==1.5.0
azure-mgmt-dns==8.2.0
azure-mgmt-keyvault==10.3.1
azure-mgmt-msi==7.0.0
azure-mgmt-rdbms==10.1.0
azure-mgmt-resource==23.2.0
azure-mgmt-storage==21.2.1
azure-storage-blob==12.23.1
azure-storage-file-datalake==12.17.0
azure-storage-file-share==12.19.0
certifi==2024.8.30
cffi==1.17.1
charset-normalizer==3.4.0
chevron==0.14.0
click==8.1.7
cryptography==43.0.3
-e git+ssh://git@github.com/alan-turing-institute/data-safe-haven.git@d51640b51032b49d35abd1e5f195c01d8e5a534a#egg=data_safe_haven
debugpy==1.8.8
dill==0.3.9
dnspython==2.7.0
fqdn==1.5.1
grpcio==1.66.2
idna==3.10
isodate==0.7.2
josepy==1.14.0
markdown-it-py==3.0.0
mdurl==0.1.2
msal==1.31.0
msal-extensions==1.2.0
msrest==0.7.1
oauthlib==3.2.2
parver==0.5
portalocker==2.10.1
protobuf==4.25.5
psycopg==3.1.19
psycopg-binary==3.1.19
pulumi==3.138.0
pulumi_azure_native==2.71.0
pulumi_azuread==6.0.1
pulumi_random==4.16.7
pycparser==2.22
pydantic==2.9.2
pydantic_core==2.23.4
Pygments==2.18.0
PyJWT==2.9.0
pyOpenSSL==24.2.1
pyRFC3339==2.0.1
pytz==2024.2
PyYAML==6.0.2
requests==2.32.3
requests-oauthlib==2.0.0
rich==13.9.4
semver==2.13.0
setuptools==75.2.0
shellingham==1.5.4
simple_acme_dns==3.2.0
six==1.16.0
typer==0.13.0
typing_extensions==4.12.2
urllib3==2.2.3
validators==0.34.0
websocket-client==1.8.0

🚫 Describe the problem

Default action Allow is not valid for NFS enabled storage accounts.
I'm a bit surprised by this because I'm sure I tested this for #2247. Perhaps I was changing this after deployment?

We either need to find a way to make this work, which might be,

  • Allow a large CIDR range?
  • Find why Allow is not valid anymore?

Or to remove this feature.

🌳 Log messages

Relevant log messages
  azure-native:storage:StorageAccount
(sre_data_storage_account_data_private_sensitive):
    error: PUT
https://management.azure.com/subscriptions/3f1a8e26-eae2-4539-952a-0a6184ec248a/resourceGroups/
shm-daimyo-sre-hojo-rg/providers/Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts/shdaisrehojsensitivedata
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    RESPONSE 400: 400 Bad Request
    ERROR CODE: NetworkAclsDefaultActionMisconfigured
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    {
      "error": {
        "code": "NetworkAclsDefaultActionMisconfigured",
        "message": "NetworkAcls default action must be set to Deny for NFS enabled account."
      }
    }
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

♻️ To reproduce

  • Deploy an SRE with data_provider_ip_addresses: Internet
@JimMadge JimMadge added the bug Problem when deploying a Data Safe Haven. label Nov 19, 2024
@JimMadge JimMadge moved this to To Be Refined in Data Safe Haven Nov 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Problem when deploying a Data Safe Haven.
Projects
Status: To Be Refined
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant