Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
There's a section in the docs explaining the differences. https://analogjs.org/docs/features/testing/overview#angular-support-for-vitest If you're on Angular v21, don't need the full config control and IDE support, I'd recommend using the native Angular integration. The Analog version will still be maintained for the immediate future. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Angular has released experimental support for vitest as a test runner. https://angular.dev/guide/testing/migrating-to-vitest
What is the recommendation for teams that are only using Analog for testing? Is there a reason to keep using Analog instead of the native Angular vitest support?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions