-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
STS-Oct-M128-Guston.rs3
60 lines (60 loc) · 2.8 KB
/
STS-Oct-M128-Guston.rs3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
<rst>
<header>
<relations>
<rel name="antithesis" type="rst" />
<rel name="background" type="rst" />
<rel name="circumstance" type="rst" />
<rel name="concession" type="rst" />
<rel name="condition" type="rst" />
<rel name="elaboration" type="rst" />
<rel name="enablement" type="rst" />
<rel name="evaluation" type="rst" />
<rel name="evidence" type="rst" />
<rel name="interpretation" type="rst" />
<rel name="justify" type="rst" />
<rel name="means" type="rst" />
<rel name="motivation" type="rst" />
<rel name="nonvolitional-cause" type="rst" />
<rel name="nonvolitional-result" type="rst" />
<rel name="otherwise" type="rst" />
<rel name="preparation" type="rst" />
<rel name="purpose" type="rst" />
<rel name="restatement" type="rst" />
<rel name="solutionhood" type="rst" />
<rel name="summary" type="rst" />
<rel name="unconditional" type="rst" />
<rel name="unless" type="rst" />
<rel name="unstated-relation" type="rst" />
<rel name="volitional-cause" type="rst" />
<rel name="volitional-result" type="rst" />
<rel name="rst" type="rst" />
<rel name="" type="rst" />
<rel name="conjunction" type="multinuc" />
<rel name="contrast" type="multinuc" />
<rel name="disjunction" type="multinuc" />
<rel name="joint" type="multinuc" />
<rel name="list" type="multinuc" />
<rel name="restatement-mn" type="multinuc" />
<rel name="sequence" type="multinuc" />
</relations>
</header>
<body>
<segment id="1" parent="2" relname="preparation">Re TURTON's recent posting,</segment>
<segment id="2" parent="5" relname="span"> STS does not need to convince policymakers very
much about science at all;</segment>
<segment id="3" parent="6" relname="span"> it turns out, in research by JASANOFF and others
(including work I have done solo and with colleague Bruce Bimber) that some
policymakers in the courts and regulatory agencies (Jasanoff) and in Congress
(Bimber & Guston) already have a good idea of the role of power, position,
uncertainty, experimental regress, flaws of peer review, interested nature of
norms, etc. in the practice of science and in its interface with policy. </segment>
<segment id="4" parent="3" relname="elaboration"> To
a certain extent, we as researchers have been behind the curve of
policymakers who, having learned that science is more like other enterprises
than they had previously imagined, have already continued to make policy
without having a new theory of how such a normal, political science might be
governed.</segment>
<group id="5" type="span" parent="3" relname="antithesis" />
<group id="6" type="span" />
</body>
</rst>