-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
STS-Oct-M38-Frost.rs3
74 lines (71 loc) · 3.41 KB
/
STS-Oct-M38-Frost.rs3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
<rst>
<header>
<relations>
<rel name="antithesis" type="rst" />
<rel name="background" type="rst" />
<rel name="circumstance" type="rst" />
<rel name="concession" type="rst" />
<rel name="condition" type="rst" />
<rel name="elaboration" type="rst" />
<rel name="enablement" type="rst" />
<rel name="evaluation" type="rst" />
<rel name="evidence" type="rst" />
<rel name="interpretation" type="rst" />
<rel name="justify" type="rst" />
<rel name="means" type="rst" />
<rel name="motivation" type="rst" />
<rel name="nonvolitional-cause" type="rst" />
<rel name="nonvolitional-result" type="rst" />
<rel name="otherwise" type="rst" />
<rel name="preparation" type="rst" />
<rel name="purpose" type="rst" />
<rel name="restatement" type="rst" />
<rel name="solutionhood" type="rst" />
<rel name="summary" type="rst" />
<rel name="unconditional" type="rst" />
<rel name="unless" type="rst" />
<rel name="unstated-relation" type="rst" />
<rel name="volitional-cause" type="rst" />
<rel name="volitional-result" type="rst" />
<rel name="rst" type="rst" />
<rel name="conjunction" type="multinuc" />
<rel name="contrast" type="multinuc" />
<rel name="disjunction" type="multinuc" />
<rel name="joint" type="multinuc" />
<rel name="list" type="multinuc" />
<rel name="restatement-mn" type="multinuc" />
<rel name="sequence" type="multinuc" />
</relations>
</header>
<body>
<segment id="1" parent="2" relname="preparation">Ron Eglash writes:</segment>
<segment id="2" parent="10" relname="span">
&gt; I'm very dissapointed with the ways
&gt; in which STS is often on the defensive around the poitical
&gt; correctness and civil liberties issues. Its
&gt; unconvincing to add on "Oh, and our new democratic science
&gt; will also avoid all the old pitfalls of socialist tyranny."
&gt;
&gt; Why can't we use these issues as an offensive platform
&gt; rather than dancing around them?</segment>
<segment id="7" parent="11" relname="span">
Fine idea.</segment>
<segment id="3" parent="8" relname="span"> Suggestions?</segment>
<segment id="4" parent="3" relname="elaboration"> Now that those of us on the left have pretty well
run the anti-nuclear stuff and eco-feminist stuff pretty hard (to the point
that the issues are pretty worn and threadbare for media exposure), que
faire?</segment>
<segment id="5" parent="9" relname="span">
As a New Yorker who has watched billions of our Fed tax money go to support
hard science, military, and aerospace projects in the Sun/Gun Belt (and we
wonder why the economy here is in a shambles!), for overt political
purposes we could point out how Big Science and the Military are machines
for enriching the BillyBobs.</segment>
<segment id="6" parent="5" relname="concession"> Few seem really interested in that, though...</segment>
<group id="8" type="span" parent="5" relname="solutionhood" />
<group id="9" type="span" parent="12" relname="span" />
<group id="10" type="span" parent="7" relname="background" />
<group id="11" type="span" parent="9" relname="background" />
<group id="12" type="span" />
</body>
</rst>