Regarding summarisation for title generation #3
QuietRocket
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment
-
Thank you for your message! There are several points to note about title-summarisation:
Making the feature optional is great and I will put it into roadmap. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
First off, I'd like to say great job on the featv2 revamp! And I like how it's now its own separate repository. Great work 👏
While reading the code, I noticed there's a functionality to update the conversation title based on the prompt.
I find this feature to be pretty nifty, but wouldn't it be good to make it optional? I just glazed over the repo, but it seems to me like if I use GPT-4, the summary will be made via GPT-4. This consists of its own request copying the prompt and possibly the entire conversation history. It seems like it will chew through API credits pretty quickly.
If I understood this situation correctly, and this indeed could be an issue, there could be two possible fixes:
Looking forward to your response,
QuietRocket
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions