You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am using Arbiter to fork a Uniswap V3 Factory. My goal is to subsequently use this fork to run some benchmarks with a newly created pool. To achieve this, I plan to call the createPool function of the Uniswap Factory. However, during the forking process, I encountered the following error:
Only handling one map deep for now. A map of a map was found and ignored.
Subsequently, when I try to use the contract, the transactions fail and do not work as expected.
Steps to reproduce
Use arbiter to fork polygon mainnet
arbiter fork fork_conf.toml --overwrite
Observe the error message: Only handling one map deep for now. A map of a map was found and ignored.
Attempt to call the createPool function on the forked factory.
Observe the revert transaction error
Expected behavior
The fork command should create a state on disk which is usable and the functions of the Uniswap V3 Factory could be called in the environment
Code snippets/links or screenshots
Here is my fork_conf.toml
# Basic configurationoutput_directory = "fork/"output_filename = "polygon.json"provider = "<my-chain-provider>"block_number = 57446120# Contracts stored in a mapping# Try this out with the weth contract
[contracts.UniswapV3Factory]
address = "0x1F98431c8aD98523631AE4a59f267346ea31F984"artifacts_path = "out/UniswapV3Factory.sol/UniswapV3Factory.json"
[contracts.SwapRouter]
address = "0xE592427A0AEce92De3Edee1F18E0157C05861564"artifacts_path = "out/SwapRouter.sol/SwapRouter.json"# EOAs
[externally_owned_accounts]
vitalik = "0xd8dA6BF26964aF9D7eEd9e03E53415D37aA96045"# vitalik.eth as of 10/2/2023
[contracts.UniswapV3Factory.mappings]
balanceOf = [
"0xd8dA6BF26964aF9D7eEd9e03E53415D37aA96045", # vitalik.eth as of 10/2/2023
]
[contracts.SwapRouter.mappings]
balanceOf = [
"0xd8dA6BF26964aF9D7eEd9e03E53415D37aA96045", # vitalik.eth as of 10/2/2023
]
Additional context
The error that i get while calling the create pool function:
called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: MiddlewareError { e: ExecutionRevert { gas_used: 24738, output: [] } }
the way that i load the contract using ethers rs
let cl = Arc::new(client);let uni_v3_factory = uniswap_v3_factory::UniswapV3Factory::new(factory_address, cl);
the way that i call the createPool function
let create_pool_function = uni_v3_factory.create_pool(token1.address(), token0.address(),500);let pool_create_transaction_hash = create_pool_function.send().await.unwrap().await.expect("Could not create pool").unwrap().transaction_hash;
Note: that the token0 and token1 are being deployed in the same script
Provide an adequate title with tags and a brief description
The tags should be in the format of "tag:" Description. Since this is a bug report, please use:
"bug:" Forking complicated contracts with map
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Problem
I am using Arbiter to fork a Uniswap V3 Factory. My goal is to subsequently use this fork to run some benchmarks with a newly created pool. To achieve this, I plan to call the
createPool
function of the Uniswap Factory. However, during the forking process, I encountered the following error:Subsequently, when I try to use the contract, the transactions fail and do not work as expected.
Steps to reproduce
Only handling one map deep for now. A map of a map was found and ignored.
createPool
function on the forked factory.Expected behavior
The fork command should create a state on disk which is usable and the functions of the Uniswap V3 Factory could be called in the environment
Code snippets/links or screenshots
Here is my
fork_conf.toml
Additional context
The error that i get while calling the create pool function:
the way that i load the contract using ethers rs
the way that i call the
createPool
functionProvide an adequate title with tags and a brief description
The tags should be in the format of "tag:" Description. Since this is a bug report, please use:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: