-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
Copy pathcong.tex
381 lines (300 loc) · 12 KB
/
cong.tex
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
\chapter{Congruent triangles}\label{chap:cong}
\section{Side-angle-side}
Our next goal is to give conditions that guarantee the congruence of two triangles.
One such condition is given in Axiom~\ref{def:birkhoff-axioms:3}; it states that if two pairs of sides of two triangles are equal, and the included angles are equal up to sign, then the triangles are congruent.
This axiom is also called the {}\emph{side-angle-side congruence condition}, or briefly, \index{SAS congruence condition}\emph{SAS}.
\section{Angle-side-angle}
\begin{thm}[\abs]{ASA condition}\label{thm:ASA}\index{ASA congruence condition}
Assume that
\begin{align*}
AB&=A'B',
&
\measuredangle A B C &= \pm\measuredangle A' B' C',
&
\measuredangle C A B&=\pm\measuredangle C' A' B'
\end{align*}
and $\triangle A' B' C'$ is nondegenerate.
Then
$$\triangle A B C\cong\triangle A' B' C'.$$
\end{thm}
For degenerate triangles this statement does not hold.
For example, consider one triangle with sides $1$, $4$, $5$
and the other with sides $2$, $3$,~$5$.
\parit{Proof.}
According to Theorem~\ref{thm:signs-of-triug},
either
\[
\measuredangle A B C = \measuredangle A' B' C'
\quad\text{and}\quad
\measuredangle C A B=\measuredangle C' A' B'
\eqlbl{eq:+angles}\]
or
\[
\measuredangle A B C = -\measuredangle A' B' C'
\quad\text{and}\quad
\measuredangle C A B=-\measuredangle C' A' B'.
\eqlbl{eq:-angles}\]
Let us assume that \ref{eq:+angles} holds;
the case \ref{eq:-angles} is analogous.
\begin{wrapfigure}{o}{26mm}
\vskip-2mm
\centering
\includegraphics{mppics/pic-36}
\end{wrapfigure}
Let $C''$ be the point on the half-line $[A' C')$ such that $A' C''\z=A C$.
By Axiom~\ref{def:birkhoff-axioms:3},
$\triangle A' B' C''\cong \triangle A B C$.
Applying Axiom~\ref{def:birkhoff-axioms:3} again,
we get that
$$\measuredangle A' B' C'' = \measuredangle A B C=\measuredangle A' B' C'.$$
By Axiom~\ref{def:birkhoff-axioms:2a}, $[B'C')=[B C'')$.
Hence
$C''$ lies on $(B' C')$ as well as on~$(A' C')$.
Since $\triangle A' B' C'$ is not degenerate, $(A' C')$ is distinct from~$(B' C')$.
Applying Axiom~\ref{def:birkhoff-axioms:1}, we get that $C''=C'$.
Therefore,
$\triangle A' B' C'=\triangle A' B' C''\cong\triangle A B C$.
\qeds
\section{Isosceles triangles}
A triangle with two equal sides is called \index{isosceles triangle}\emph{isosceles};
the remaining side is called the \index{base}\emph{base}.
\begin{thm}[\abs]{Theorem}\label{thm:isos}
Assume $\triangle A B C$ is an isosceles triangle with the base $[A B]$.
Then
$$\measuredangle A B C\equiv -\measuredangle B A C.$$
Moreover, the converse holds if $\triangle A B C$ is nondegenerate.
\end{thm}
The following proof is due to Pappus of Alexandria.
\begin{wrapfigure}[10]{o}{25mm}
\vskip-4mm
\centering
\includegraphics{mppics/pic-38}
\end{wrapfigure}
\parit{Proof.}
Note that
$$C A = C B,
\quad
C B=C A,
\quad
\measuredangle A C B \equiv -\measuredangle B C A.$$
By Axiom~\ref{def:birkhoff-axioms:3},
$$\triangle C A B\cong\triangle C B A.$$
Applying the theorem on the signs of angles of triangles (\ref{thm:signs-of-triug}) and Axiom~\ref{def:birkhoff-axioms:3} again,
we get that
$$\measuredangle B A C
\equiv -\measuredangle A B C.$$
To prove the converse, we assume that
$\measuredangle C A B \z\equiv - \measuredangle C B A$.
By the ASA condition (\ref{thm:ASA}), $\triangle C A B\z\cong\triangle CBA$.
Therefore,~$C A\z=C B$.
\qeds
A triangle with three equal sides is called \index{equilateral triangle}\emph{equilateral}.
\begin{thm}{Exercise}\label{ex:equilateral}
Let $\triangle ABC$ be an equilateral triangle.
Show that
\[\measuredangle ABC=\measuredangle BCA=\measuredangle CAB.\]
\end{thm}
\section{Side-side-side}
\begin{thm}[\abs]{SSS condition}\label{thm:SSS}\index{SSS congruence condition}
$\triangle A B C\cong\triangle A' B' C'$ if
$$A' B'=A B,
\quad
B' C'=B C,
\quad
\text{and}
\quad
C' A'=C A.$$
\end{thm}
Note that this condition is valid for degenerate triangles as well.
\parit{Proof.}
Choose $C''$ so that $A' C''= A' C'$ and $\measuredangle B' A' C''= \measuredangle B A C$.
According to Axiom~\ref{def:birkhoff-axioms:3},
$$\triangle A' B' C''\cong\triangle A B C.$$
It will suffice to
prove that
$$\triangle A' B' C'\cong\triangle A' B' C''.\eqlbl{eq:A'B'C'simA'B'C''}$$
The condition \ref{eq:A'B'C'simA'B'C''} holds trivially if $C''\z=C'$.
Thus, it remains to consider the case $C''\z\ne C'$.
\begin{wrapfigure}{o}{30mm}
\centering
\includegraphics{mppics/pic-40}
\end{wrapfigure}
Clearly, the corresponding sides of $\triangle A' B' C'$ and $\triangle A' B' C''$ are equal.
Hence the triangles
$\triangle C' A' C''$ and $\triangle C' B' C''$ are isosceles.
By Theorem~\ref{thm:isos}, we have
\begin{align*}
\measuredangle A' C'' C'&\equiv -\measuredangle A' C' C'',
\\
\measuredangle C' C'' B'&\equiv -\measuredangle C'' C' B'.
\end{align*}
Adding them, we get that
$$\measuredangle A' C'' B'
\equiv -\measuredangle A' C' B'.$$
Applying Axiom~\ref{def:birkhoff-axioms:3} again,
we get \ref{eq:A'B'C'simA'B'C''}.
\qeds
\begin{thm}[\abs]{Corollary}\label{cor:degenerate-trig}
If $AB+BC=AC$, then $B\in [AC]$.
\end{thm}
\parit{Proof.}
Since $AB+BC=AC$, we can choose $B'\in [AC]$ such that $AB=AB'$;
observe that $BC\z=B'C$.
We may assume that $AB>0$ and $BC>0$;
otherwise, $A=B$ or $B=C$, and the statement follows.
In this case, $\measuredangle AB'C=\pi$.
By SSS,
\[\triangle ABC\cong \triangle AB'C.\]
Therefore $\measuredangle ABC=\pi$.
By Theorem~\ref{thm:straight-angle}, $B$ lies between $A$ and $C$.
\qeds
\begin{thm}{Advanced exercise}\label{ex:SMS}
Consider two triangles $A B C$ and $A' B' C'$.
Let $M$ be the midpoint of $[A B]$, and
$M'$ be the midpoint of $[A' B']$.
Assume $C' A'=C A$, $C' B'= C B$, and $C' M'\z= C M$.
Prove that
\[\triangle A' B' C'\cong\triangle A B C.\]
\end{thm}
{
\begin{wrapfigure}[6]{r}{26mm}
\vskip-0mm
\centering
\includegraphics{mppics/pic-42}
\end{wrapfigure}
\begin{thm}{Exercise}\label{ex:isos-sides}
Let $\triangle A B C$ be an isosceles triangle with the base $[A B]$.
Suppose that point $A'$ lies between $B$ and $C$,
point $B'$ lies between $A$ and $C$,
and $C A'\z=C B'$.
Show that
\begin{enumerate}[(a)]
\item $\triangle A A' C\cong \triangle B B' C$;
\item $\triangle A B B'\cong \triangle B A A'$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{thm}
\begin{thm}{Exercise}\label{ex:ABC-motion}
Let $\triangle ABC$ be a nondegenerate triangle, and
let $f$ be a motion of the plane
such that
$$f(A)=A,
\quad
f(B)=B,
\quad
\text{and}
\quad
f(C)=C.$$
Show that $f$ is the identity map;
that is, $f(X)=X$ for any point $X$ on the plane.
\end{thm}
}
%{
%\begin{wrapfigure}{r}{28mm}\vskip-11mm\centering\includegraphics{mppics/pic-43}\end{wrapfigure}
%\begin{thm}{Exercise}\label{ex:3-isos}
%Suppose that $\triangle ABC'$, $\triangle BCA'$, and $\triangle CAB'$ are isosceles triangles that lie outside of $\triangle ABC$;
%that is,
%$A$ and $A'$ lie on the opposite sides of $(BC)$,
%$B$ and $B'$ lie on the opposite sides of $(CA)$,
%$C$ and $C'$ lie on the opposite sides of $(AB)$.
%Show that $AA'=BB'=CC'$.
%\end{thm}
%}
\section{On side-side-angle and side-angle-angle}
In each of the conditions SAS, ASA, and SSS we specify three corresponding parts of the triangles.
Now, let us discuss other triples of corresponding parts.
The first triple is called {}\emph{side-side-angle}, or briefly SSA;
it specifies two sides and a non-included angle.
This condition is not sufficient for congruence.
In other words, there exist two nondegenerate triangles $ABC$ and $A'B'C'$ such that
\[AB=A'B',\quad BC=B'C',\quad \measuredangle BAC\equiv\pm \measuredangle B'A'C',\]
but $\triangle ABC\not\cong\triangle A'B'C'$ and $AC\ne A'C'$.
\begin{wrapfigure}{r}{35mm}
\vskip-6mm
\centering
\includegraphics{mppics/pic-44}
\end{wrapfigure}
We will not use this negative statement, so there is no need to prove it formally.
You can guess an example from the picture.
The second triple is {}\emph{side-angle-angle}, or briefly SAA;
it specifies one side and two angles one of which is opposite to the side.
This provides a congruence condition;
that is, if one of the triangles $ABC$ or $A'B'C'$ is nondegenerate and
$AB=A'B'$, $\measuredangle ABC\equiv\pm \measuredangle A'B'C'$, $\measuredangle BCA\z\equiv\pm \measuredangle B'C'A'$,
then $\triangle ABC\cong\triangle A'B'C'$.
The SAA condition will not be used directly in the sequel.
One proof of this condition can be obtained from ASA and the theorem on the sum of angles of a triangle, which is proved below (see~\ref{thm:3sum}).
For a more direct proof, see Exercise~\ref{ex:SAA}.
Another triple is called {}\emph{angle-angle-angle}, or briefly AAA.
By Axiom~\ref{def:birkhoff-axioms:4}, it is not a congruence condition in the Euclidean plane.
However, in the hyperbolic plane it is; see \ref{thm:AAA}.
\section{Constructions}
The construction problems provide a valuable source of exercises in geometry,
which we will use further in the book.
The whole Chapter~\ref{chap:car} will be devoted to the subject.
{
\begin{wrapfigure}{o}{33mm}
\vskip-4mm
\centering
\includegraphics{mppics/pic-445}
\bigskip
\includegraphics{mppics/pic-446}
\bigskip
\includegraphics{mppics/pic-447}
\bigskip
\includegraphics{mppics/pic-448}
\bigskip
\includegraphics{mppics/pic-449}
\end{wrapfigure}
A \index{ruler-and-compass construction}\emph{ruler-and-compass construction} is a construction with an idealized ruler and compass.
The idealized ruler can be used only to draw a line thru the given two points.
The idealized compass can be used only to draw a circle with a given center and radius.
That is, given three points $A$, $B$, and $O$
we can draw the circle of radius $AB$ centered at~$O$.
We may also mark new points in the plane,
as well as on the constructed lines, circles,
and their intersections (assuming that such points exist).
We may also look at the different sets of construction tools.
For example,
we may only use the ruler,
or we may invent a new tool,
say a tool that produces a midpoint for any given two points,
or the reflection of one point across the other.
As an example, let us consider the following problem:
\begin{thm}{Problem}
Given two lines $\ell$ and $m$ and a point $M$ not on these lines,
construct a line segment with ends on $\ell$ and $m$ that is bisected by~$M$.
\end{thm}
The stages of the following construction are shown in the picture.
\parit{Construction.}
\begin{enumerate}[1.]
\item Draw a circle centered at $M$ that crosses line $\ell$ at two points, say $P$ and $Q$.
\item Draw the line $(PM)$ and mark by $P'$ its other point of intersection with the circle.
Similarly, draw $(QM)$ and mark the other intersection point by $Q'$.
\item Draw the line $\ell'=(P'Q')$ and mark by $A$ its point of intersection with $m$ (if it exists).
\item Draw the line $(MA)$;
mark by $B$ its point of intersection with $\ell$.
Then $[AB]$ is the required segment.
\end{enumerate}
}
It is often required to do \emph{problem analysis};
proving that the result of the construction satisfies the required conditions and also determine when the construction is possible and how many solutions may exist.
Let us do it for the example above.
\parit{Problem analysis.}
Notice that $P'$ and $Q'$ are reflections of $P$ and $Q$ across $M$.
Therefore, the line $\ell'=(P'Q')$ is the reflection of $\ell=(PQ)$ across $M$.
Since $A$ lies on $\ell'$,
the point $B$ is the reflection of $A$ across $M$.
Indeed, $B$ is the (necessarily unique) point of intersection of $(MA)$ and $\ell$, and $\ell'$ is the reflection of $\ell$.
By the definition of reflection, $M$ is the midpoint of $[AB]$.
The line $\ell'$ may have no points of intersection with $m$.
In this case, the problem has no solution.
Also, it might happen that $\ell'=m$;
in this case, we have an infinite set of solutions --- any point on $m$ can be marked as~$A$.
In all the remaining cases, we have exactly one solution.
\qeds
\begin{thm}{Exercise}\label{ex:motion}
Suppose $\triangle ABC$ and $\triangle A'B'C'$ are congruent nondegenerate triangles;
in particular, there is a motion $f$ such that
\[f\colon A\mapsto A',\quad f\colon B\mapsto B',\quad\text{and}\quad f\colon C\mapsto C'.\]
Given a point $X$, construct $X'=f(X)$.
\end{thm}