-
Proposal:Hey everyone 👋 Our team uses backfills heavily, and one pain point we keep running into is the lack of visibility into how a backfill is actually progressing. Right now there's no easy way to answer simple questions like:
The DAG Runs UI doesn't show the backfill ID, and the Backfill UI doesn't show the linked DAG runs — so you're left cross-referencing manually or digging through logs. What I'm proposingA simple progress tracker on the Backfill detail page that shows the breakdown of linked DAG runs by state: pending, running, succeeded, and failed — similar to what you'd see in a CI pipeline summary. Here's a rough mockup of what it could look like:
Nothing fancy — just enough to answer "how's my backfill doing?" at a glance. Prior artThis has been discussed before in #18317 and #41542, but those were broader UX overhauls. This is intentionally smaller in scope — just surfacing state counts for the DAG runs tied to a given backfill, now that Airflow 3 has proper backfill IDs and a dedicated backfill UI to build on. Happy to submit a PR if there's appetite for this. Would love to hear if others have run into the same issue, or if there are concerns about the approach before I dig in. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
Yeou cna always submit a PR - i do not think we need to discuss every single small think like that. Let lack of answer in discussions do not discourage you from iterating on and completing good PR - discussion over green PR where anyone can easily run locally is always best. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.

Yeou cna always submit a PR - i do not think we need to discuss every single small think like that. Let lack of answer in discussions do not discourage you from iterating on and completing good PR - discussion over green PR where anyone can easily run locally is always best.