Skip to content

[Java][Debezium] Fix NPE in debeziumRecordInstant for DELETE events#37795

Open
liferoad wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
liferoad:fix/beam-37738-debezium-delete-ts-usec
Open

[Java][Debezium] Fix NPE in debeziumRecordInstant for DELETE events#37795
liferoad wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
liferoad:fix/beam-37738-debezium-delete-ts-usec

Conversation

@liferoad
Copy link
Contributor

@liferoad liferoad commented Mar 8, 2026

What changed

  • Updated KafkaConnectUtils.debeziumRecordInstant(SourceRecord) to avoid dereferencing valueSchema() when it is null.
  • Preserved existing ts_ms extraction path for normal struct-valued Debezium records.
  • Added fallback to sourceOffset.ts_usec (microseconds) for DELETE events and converted to epoch millis.
  • Added/updated unit tests in KafkaConnectSchemaTest for:
    • null valueSchema + ts_usec fallback success
    • missing timestamp sources throws IllegalArgumentException

Why

Fixes a NullPointerException reported for Debezium DELETE operations where value and valueSchema are null but timestamp exists in source offset metadata.

Fixes #37738

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a NullPointerException that occurred during Debezium DELETE operations when value and valueSchema were null, but timestamp information was available in the source offset metadata. The changes enhance the timestamp extraction logic to gracefully handle these edge cases, ensuring that Debezium records, particularly DELETE events, are processed correctly without errors, thereby improving the stability and reliability of the Debezium connector.

Highlights

  • Timestamp Extraction Logic: The debeziumRecordInstant method was updated to safely handle cases where valueSchema is null, specifically for Debezium DELETE events.
  • Fallback for DELETE Events: A new fallback mechanism was introduced to extract timestamps from sourceOffset.ts_usec (microseconds) when the primary ts_ms field in the record value is unavailable.
  • Preserved Existing Behavior: The original logic for extracting ts_ms from struct-valued Debezium records remains intact for non-DELETE events.
  • Enhanced Unit Tests: New unit tests were added to cover scenarios involving null valueSchema with ts_usec fallback and cases where no valid timestamp source is present, ensuring robust error handling.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog
  • sdks/java/io/debezium/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/io/debezium/KafkaConnectUtils.java
    • Modified the debeziumRecordInstant method to first check for a non-null valueSchema and ts_ms field in the record value.
    • Added a secondary check to extract the timestamp from record.sourceOffset().get("ts_usec") if the primary method fails, converting microseconds to milliseconds.
    • Updated the IllegalArgumentException message to reflect both possible timestamp sources.
  • sdks/java/io/debezium/src/test/java/org/apache/beam/io/debezium/KafkaConnectSchemaTest.java
    • Updated the assertion message in testTimestampRequired to match the new exception message.
    • Added testDebeziumRecordInstantNullValueSchema to verify correct timestamp extraction from ts_usec when valueSchema is null.
    • Added testDebeziumRecordInstantMissingTimestamp to confirm that an IllegalArgumentException is thrown when neither ts_ms nor ts_usec is available.
Activity
  • No human activity has been recorded for this pull request yet.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 8, 2026

Assigning reviewers:

R: @Abacn for label java.

Note: If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer.

Available commands:

  • stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
  • remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
  • waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).


@Test
public void testTimestampRequired() {
org.apache.kafka.connect.source.SourceRecord record = SourceRecordJsonTest.buildSourceRecord();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: import the name. Not sure why it used fully qualified name at the first place.

Copy link
Contributor

@Abacn Abacn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

Tested locally, delete event now propagated successfully.

@Abacn
Copy link
Contributor

Abacn commented Mar 9, 2026

As a follow up:

We may consider including potentially useful information (e.g. key, kafka partition) in this case. After this fix, the tombstone event is recorded as an empty element here.

For now the current form is sufficient to resolve the NPE bug.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: KafkaConnectUtils.debeziumRecordInstant() fails with NullPointerException on DELETE operations

2 participants