UDP Port Sharing between Hysteria and Other UDP protocols #342
Unanswered
rwenzlofsky
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments
-
I've never tried sslh before, but looks like it does support UDP and can recognize QUIC traffic already. P.S. You need to turn off obfuscation for it to recognize Hysteria connections as QUIC |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
You can use |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi. I am currently working remotely from Cuba for a European company and use Hysteria on my self-hosted VPN (located in Miami). First of all, congratulations, out of all protocols I tried on my VPN server this one offers me the lowest latency. It really "feels" when using the Horizon client remote access as if I would be in Europe. With TCP protocols I always had this small delay when typing on the keyboard, but with Hysteria, I don't recognize a delay at all. Another important thing is that although the Cuban INternet provider is doing internet censorship, I have no issue bypassing when running Hysteria on port 443...which leads me to my question: I run several TCP based protocols via port sharing with sslh on port TCP 443, but I would like to do the same for UDP (as I want to run Vless via QUIC as well). Do you have any ideas on how this can be achieved? Is it possible to define an SNI in the client configuration of Hysteria? This would help me already I assume as such should be able to handle UDP traffic as well.
Any help is appreciated.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions