You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have encountered some issues while using ClinicaDL for neuroimaging analysis. Specifically, I am interested in using your tool to test the generalization capability of a pre-trained model. The issue arises when running the clinicadl predict command, which seems to require a TSV file containing a 'diagnosis' column.
In the context of generalization testing, diagnostic information is often either unavailable or irrelevant. Therefore, I am wondering if there is a way to perform generalization tests without providing a 'diagnosis' column.
If such a feature or option does not currently exist, I strongly suggest adding it as a new feature or option. This would greatly enhance the flexibility of ClinicaDL in practical applications.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I have encountered some issues while using ClinicaDL for neuroimaging analysis. Specifically, I am interested in using your tool to test the generalization capability of a pre-trained model. The issue arises when running the clinicadl predict command, which seems to require a TSV file containing a 'diagnosis' column.
In the context of generalization testing, diagnostic information is often either unavailable or irrelevant. Therefore, I am wondering if there is a way to perform generalization tests without providing a 'diagnosis' column.
If such a feature or option does not currently exist, I strongly suggest adding it as a new feature or option. This would greatly enhance the flexibility of ClinicaDL in practical applications.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions