Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dev Containers for running Conformitron in DevPod for Partner Testing #253

Closed
elamaran11 opened this issue Apr 22, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #254
Closed

Dev Containers for running Conformitron in DevPod for Partner Testing #253

elamaran11 opened this issue Apr 22, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #254
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@elamaran11
Copy link
Contributor

elamaran11 commented Apr 22, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Dev Containers for running Blueprints in DevPod

Describe the solution you'd like
Dev Containers for running Conformitron in DevPod like https://github.com/cnoe-io/idpbuilder/tree/main/.devcontainer for an ISV partner to validate his product.
This Dev Container should have a tools like Flux Cli, Kubectl, Helm installed along with utility like idpbuilder which has a mechanism to create a Kind Cluster or MiniKube with Flux, external secrets to hook up and run tests for Partners locally one step.

Inspiration : https://github.com/cnoe-io/idpbuilder/tree/main

Describe alternatives you've considered
Running in local

Additional context
https://containers.dev/features

@elamaran11 elamaran11 added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 22, 2024
@elamaran11 elamaran11 changed the title Dev Containers for running Blueprints in DevPod Dev Containers for running Conformitron in DevPod for Partner Testing Apr 22, 2024
@elamaran11 elamaran11 linked a pull request Apr 23, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants